JCC Construction & Design v. Xu & Zhang
Mar 16, 2011OUTCOME: Settled
Defense of construction materialman lien case involving large shopping center development.
Atlanta, GA
Lawsuits and disputes Lawyer at Atlanta, GA
Practice Areas: Lawsuits & Disputes, Litigation ... +17 more
OUTCOME: Settled
Defense of construction materialman lien case involving large shopping center development.
OUTCOME: Settled
Construction materialman lien case involving large shopping center development.
OUTCOME: Judgment in Plaintiff's Favor
Materialman/Construction Lien Foreclosure. Default Judgment issued in favor of Plaintiff for all liquidated amounts sought due to Defendant's failure to appear at trial.
OUTCOME: Settlement, Favorable to Plaintiff
Breach of contract action. Plaintiff recovered the entire amount of the underlying claim for actual/liquidated damages.
OUTCOME: Mixed
Materialman/Construction Lien Foreclosure. Judgment for Defendant on main claim [due to pre-existing fatal defect prior to Plaintiff's Counsel's entry of appearance into the case. Judgment for Plainti ... ff on Defendant's Counterclaim.
OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement
Breach of Contract/Breach of Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing arising from management agreement in connection with operation of a Chevron gasoline station/convenience store.
OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement
Truth in Lending (TILA) and related claims arising from financing/purchase of vehicle.
OUTCOME: Favorable Settlement for Plaintiff
Primary cause of action premised upon violation(s) of Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act [FCRA], Truth in Lending Act [TILA], Regulation Z and related Statutes [e.g., 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et. seq.] in conju ... nction with obtaining [and failing to prevent another party obtaining] Plaintiff's Consumer Credit Report(s) under false pretenses and or without a permissible purpose. Additional state law causes of action included Invasion of Privacy, Slander, Defamation, Libel, Infliction of Emotional Distress, violation of Fair Business Practices Act, Fraud, Conversion, Trespass, etc.
OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement Agreement
Plaintiff alleged numerous violations of Truth in Lending, Fair Credit Reporting, Fair Credit Billing and related laws by "Big Three" Credit Reporting Agencies and credit card bank(s).
OUTCOME: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Denied
[Excerpted from West Case Headnote reported at 174 F.Supp.2d 1331 (USDC ND GA, 2001)]: Owners of household goods brought state court action against moving companies alleging various claims, includin ... g breach of contract, conversion, breach of bailment agreement, trespass, intentional infliction of emotional distress and loss of consortium. Owners' claims for emotional distress and loss of consortium against interstate moving companies were sufficiently separate and distinct from claims for injury involving damage to their household goods and moving companies' duties under bill of lading, and thus were not preempted by Carmack Amendment, which governed motor carriers' liability for loss or damage to goods shipped in interstate commerce; one owner asserted that he sought psychiatric treatment and suffered exacerbation of his medical condition as he was undergoing cancer treatment under relevant time period, and other owner asserted that owners' emotional distress resulted in unlawful loss of companionship between them.