Los Angeles, CA
Real estate Lawyer at Los Angeles, CA
Practice Areas: Real Estate, Business, Unknown
OUTCOME: Defense Verdict
Defendant Client was sued for Breach of Fiduciary Duty as Trustee of a Trust. Plaintiff demanded 2,000,000 in damages. Case was tried in Federal Court in Arkansas before a jury for 5 days. Defendant Cl ... ient prevailed as jury saw no liability.
OUTCOME: Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Client and award of Attorneys Fees- Affirmed on Appeal
Plaintiff Regency Midland Construction, Inc. hired subcontractor Legendary Structures, Inc. to do the concrete work for a new apartment building. Legendary quit halfway through. A dispute arose as to ... the “retention” clause in the contract. Regency's Summary Judgment was granted as to the amount it was able to retain pursuant to the Contract and dismissed Legendary’ s cross-claims. The case was appealed and the issue revolved around interpretation of the contract. The appeals court affirmed the appeal.
OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement
This case spawn four different cases where the amount in controversy exceeded one million dollars. The four cases included cases in State Court and Bankruptcy Court adversary proceedings. Each case was ... settled with the best possible outcome for the Client.
OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement
Homeowner brought suit against broker wherein it was alleged that broker offered and purchased homeowners property subject to the first trust deed. It was alleged that broker did not explain the transa ... ction and the terms of the sale. When the market crashed, Broker quit claimed the property back to homeowner and homeowner was as a result saddled with an upside down mortgage.
OUTCOME: 50 Million Dollar Claim- Dismissed in favor of Defendant Client
Plaintiffs sought damages for Fraud and various other claims in their purchase of a Condotel in Waikiki Hawaii. They claimed damages in excess of 50 million dollars. We represented the Brokers who faci ... litated the transaction. We secured a dismissal of the brokers from the action without any monetary payment.
OUTCOME: Judgement in the amount of $103, 427
Trucking company retained the services of a mortgage broker to procure a loan. The trucking company sign a non-circumvent agreement and demand to pay a commission upon the successful close of escrow. ... Prior to the close of escrow, Trucking company instructed escrow not to pay the commission.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
