Subcontractor v. Contractor
Apr 01, 2013OUTCOME: Successful defense.
Successfully defended general contractor in Miller Act suit/bond claim asserted by subcontractor. Subcontractor claimed amounts owing for additional work allegedly performed.
Construction and development Lawyer
Practice Areas: Construction & Development, Business ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Successful defense.
Successfully defended general contractor in Miller Act suit/bond claim asserted by subcontractor. Subcontractor claimed amounts owing for additional work allegedly performed.
OUTCOME: Favorable Decision
Obtained approval for a 320 acre annexation which enables our request for the 80 acre North Idaho Sports Complex to be presented. Once approved, the City of Hayden will host an amazing multi-sports c ... omplex which will benefit our families and our community immeasurably.
OUTCOME: _
Represented contractor in suit alleging damage to neighboring property
OUTCOME: Succesful negotiation with County resulted in desired outcome within two weeks.
Represented client with zoning issue in Kootenai County. County had made adverse decision. Goal was to have them reconsider and reverse the decision quickly.
OUTCOME: Succesful outcome for client
Represented general contractor
OUTCOME: Significant financial judgment for my client
Represented wife in week-long divorce trial involving complex property issues.
OUTCOME: $1.1 million dollar judgment in favor of our client
Represented contractor in multimillion dollar complex construction litigation involving a variety of defect and delay claims.
OUTCOME: Successful Decision for my client
Represented Kootenai County in Medical Indigency Case