Charles Lewis Gholz

Charles Lewis Gholz

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 54 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Alexandria, VA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA

About Charles

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 54 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1972

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 49 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1977

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Charles Lewis Gholz

1940 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Charles Lewis Gholz's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Charles Lewis Gholz's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Charles

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2012

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Leading Lawyer, Chambers USA

2010

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Expertise Guide

2009

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2009

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

2008

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2007

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

2006

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2005

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

2003

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

2001

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

2000

Special Citation, Patent and Trademark Office Society

1999

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

1997

The Best of the Best, Patent Law Experts Guide

Associations

1978 - Present

Advisory Board of the Patent, Trademark, & Copyright Journal

Member

1985 - 1986

District of Columbia Bar- Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Section

Vice-Chair

1984 - 1986

District of Columbia Bar- Patent, Cpyright and Trademark Section

Member- steering committee

1983 - 1984

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Chairman-Interference Law & Practice Subcommittee

1982 - 1983

American Bar Association- Patent, Copyright, and Trademark Section

Chairman- Federal Circuit subcommittee of the Court of Appeals

1978 - 1979

Association of Former CCPA Law Clerks and Technical Advisors

President

1973 - 1975

American Intellectual Property Law Association,

Chairman- Moot Court Competition subcommittee

Education

1973

George Washington University

LL.M - Master of Laws

1968

Columbia University

JD - Juris Doctor

1965

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

BS - Bachelor of Science

1965

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2008

The Salishan Conference

Interference Law

Publications

2011

Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal Using a Suggestion of Interference to Undermine a Competitor’s U.S. Patent Application

2011

Intellectual Property Today (165) Is the Board Putting Some Teeth into the Sanctions Rule?,

2011

Intellectual Property Today (166) What Does Your Priority Statement Buy You?,

2011

Intellectual Property Today (167) What to Do if Fewer Than All of the Named Inventors Contributed to the Subject Matter Defined by the Count?,

2011

Intellectual Property Today (168) What to Do if the APJ Limits the Number of Claims to be Added to a Patent or an Application in Interference

2011

Intellectual Property Today (171) Additional Discovery Prior to Cross-Examination

2011

Intellectual Property Today (172) Can an Amendment Deleting A Limitation Run Afoul of 35 USC 135(b)?,

2011

Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society (169) A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences

2010

Intellectual Property Today (151) Are District Court Orders Remanding 35 USC 146 Actions Appealable?,

2010

Medical Innovations and Business (159) Would Derivation Proceedings Be the Same as Derivation Interferences?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today (152) Prosecution of Targeting and Targeted Applications Before the Same Examiner,

2010

Intellectual Property Today (153) The Board Must Decide Every Patentability Motion That is “Fairly Raised and Fully Developed During the Interference”--But Must it Permit Every Authorized Patentability Motion to Be “Fully Developed”?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today How Good is Good Enough?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today (155) Are Agilent and Philips Limited to Claims Copied in Ipsissimis Verbis?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today (156) A Critique of Recent Opinions in Patent Interferences

2010

Intellectual Property Today (157) Are All Panels of the Federal Circuit Following Agilent and Phillips?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today When, If Ever, Do Broadening Amendments Create Problems Under 35 USC 135(b)?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today (160) Should a Patent Infringement Action Be Stayed Pending Resolution of an Interference Involving the Patent Asserted in the Infringement Action?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today Is the Respondent’s Entire Specification “Prior Art” in a Motion for a Judgment of No-Interference-in-Fact?,

2010

Intellectual Property Today How Close is Close Enough?

2010

Intellectual Property Today (163) When Should a Patentability Motion Be Deferred to the Second Phase

2010

Intellectual Property Today (164) You Must Aggressively Assert Your Rights Under Koninklijke!

1973

Washington Law Review Patent and Trademark Jurisdiction of the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

1973

Journal of the Patent Office Society (4) The Defense of Patent Invalidity in Tariff Commission Patent Actions

1972

Journal of the Patent Office Society (3) Recent Developments in the CCPA Relating to the First Paragraph of 35 USC 112

1971

Journal of the Patent Office Society Commissioners for the CCPA

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution