William Lamarca

William Lamarca

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.6

Licensed for 32 years

Litigation Lawyer at Alexandria, VA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Appeals, Intellectual Property ... +2 more

PO Box 1450, Mail Stop 8 (USPTO), Alexandria, VA

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Government Attorney

About William

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Litigation 35%

Represents PTO in Patent & IP litigation, arguing appeals, leading federal trial work in §§145 and 1071(b) cases, and defending other civil actions in federal courts throughout nation. Wide spectrum of IP and related issues litigated.

27 years | 200 cases

35%
Appeals 30%

Appeared as lead/co-counsel on over 125 appeals. Also work with SG’s Office, DOJ Civil Appellate division to assist with gov't briefing at SCT and Circuit courts of appeal.

27 years | 150 cases

30%
Intellectual Property 25%

Litigated issues that span specific patent, TM and copyright questions to broader issues of jurisdiction, procedure, admin law and ethics. Advisor to agency on policy, etc.

33 years | 200 cases

25%
Administrative Law 5%

Defend government in civil actions filed in federal courts throughout the US. While cases often substantively involve patent, trademark and copyright issues, they also include issues driven by adminlaw, e.g., relating to APA.

27 years | 30 cases

5%
Ethics and Professional Responsibility 5%

Lead prosecutor on numerous trials in Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) proceedings. Additionally give legal advice to OED Director.

27 years | 20 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Virginia for 27 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Maryland for 31 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 1994

Inactive - Retired

No misconduct found

Licensed in Ohio for 32 years

State: Ohio

Acquired: 1993

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR, USPTO

PO Box 1450, Mail Stop 8 (USPTO), Alexandria, VA, 22313-1450

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

William Lamarca's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

William Lamarca's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse William

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.6 (Superb)

Honors

2011

Bronze Medal, Superior Federal Service, US Department of Commerce

2009

Bronze Medal, US Department of Commerce

2008

Attorney of the Year, Solilcitors Office, Department of Commerce

Work Experience

2014 - Present

Special Counsel for IP Litigation, Office of the Solicitor, USPTO

2008 - Present

Special Assistant US Attorney, DC US Attorneys Office

2014 - 2021

Adjunct Law Professor, Georgetown University Law Center

2000 - 2014

Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, USPTO

1996 - 1999

Patent Examiner, USPTO

1994 - 1996

Associate Attorney, Lalos and Keegan

1993 - 2018

Naval Officer-Engineering Duty (Reserves), United States Navy

1986 - 1990

Experimental Flight Test/Design Engineer, Boeing Commercial Airpland Co.

Associations

2000 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

2000 - Present

Federal Circuit Bar Association

Prior Co-Chair PTO Committee

1994 - Present

Cleveland Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

In re North Carolina Lottery, 866 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Agency position affirmed on appeal.

Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple, 137 S.Ct. 429 (2016)

(1) "article of manufacture,” as in Section 289, encompasses both a product sold and a component of that product, and (2) components of infringing product could be relevant “article of manufacture,” although components could not be purchased separately.

Immersion Corp. v. HTC Corp., 826 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Agency position affirmed

Schott Gemtron v SSW v PTO, 612 Fed. Appx 614 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Agency's Position Affirmed

Helferich v. CBS Interactive, 599 Fed. Appx. 955 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

agency's position affirmed

Medtronic v. Mirowski, 134 S.Ct. 843 (2013)

government's position agreed with

In re Owens, 710 F.3d 1362 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

agency's board decision affirmed

Antor Media, 689 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

agency's board decision affirmed

Microsoft v. i4i, 131 S. Ct. 2238 (2011)

favorable to government's position

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Partnership, 564 U.S. 91 (2011)

Federal Circuit Affirmed. Held: Section 282 requires an invalidity defense to be proved by clear and convincing evidence.

Translogic, 504 F.3d 1249 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

agency's board decision affirmed

Trans Texas, 498 F.3d 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2007)

agency's board decision affirmed

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University

MSEE

1996

George Washington University National Law Center

LL.M - Master of Laws, Patent & IP Law

1985

University of Toledo

BSME/MSME

Speaking Engagements

2018

Center for Advanced Study & Research on Intellectual Property Law (CASRIP)

Guest Lecturer in Law (Patent Law and Procedure), UW School of Law

2016

Teaching (IP Appellate Advocacy)

Adjunct Professor, Georgetown University Law Center

2015

2015 High Technology Protection Summit

Challenging Sotware-Business Method Patent Eligibility in Civil Actions and Post Grant Review

2015

101 Eligibilitly Conference, Japan

Alice v CLS Bank, Impact on Patent Eligibility, Tokyo Medical/Dental Univeristy, Tokyo, Japan

2014

UW School of Law -- Center for Advanced Study & Research on Intellectual Property Law (CASRIP)

Guest Lecturer in Law (Patent Law and Procedure), UW School of Law

2014

Advanced Patent Law Institute (UT, GMU, USPTO)

US Implementation of Hague Treaty on Designs

Publications

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution