Marc R Labgold

Marc R Labgold

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 30 years

Arbitration Lawyer at Reston, VA
Practice Areas: Arbitration, Patent Infringement, Patent Application

12005 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 203, Reston, VA

About Marc

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Arbitration 50%

Proven track record as lead counsel in international arbitration including cases administered under UNCITRAL, ICC, HKIAC, and JCAA arbitral rules.

16 years | 10 cases

50%
Patent Infringement 45%

Registered patent attorney specializing in patent litigation, trade secrets, unfair competition (including illegal restraints of trade, antitrust, deceptive trade practice, U.S.I.T.C. §337 actions). USPTO Post-Issuance Proceedings before the PTAB.

35 years | 60 cases

45%
Patent Application 5%

Full scope of patent opinion work (freedom-to operate, infringement, invalidity, etc.). Reexamination, Reissue, IPRs.

35 years | 200 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 24 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2001

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Georgia for 30 years

State: Georgia

Acquired: 1995

Active Member in Good Standing

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of Marc R Labgold, P.C.

12005 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite 203, Reston, VA, 20191

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Marc R Labgold's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Marc R Labgold's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Marc

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Michael Lee Doane headshot
Michael Doane

Antitrust and trade law lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2005

2005 Legal Elite, Washington Smart CEO Magazine

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Managing Member, Law Offices of Marc R. Labgold, P.C.

2009 - Present

Of Counsel, Nagashima Hashimoto & Yasukuni

2022 - 2022

Adjunct Professor, Florida International University College Of Law

2002 - 2008

Partner, Patton Boggs

2000 - 2002

Partner, Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe

1999 - 2000

Partner, Long Aldridge & Norman

1990 - 1999

Partner, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, PC

Associations

2021 - Present

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Member

2021 - Present

Bali International Arbitration and Mediation Center

Fellow

2019 - Present

International Bar Association

Member

2009 - Present

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc., Civil Action No. 18-0463-LPS-CJB (D. Del.).

Successful, invalidating all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit.

Seneca IP Licensing LLC v. Oki Data Americas, Inc., Civil Action No. 18-0057-LPS-CJB (D. Del.).

Case against client voluntarily dismissed without liability or damages prior to claim construction.

Freeny, et al. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc., et al., Consolidated Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-0183-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.).

Successful; Case against client voluntarily dismissed without liability or damages prior to claim construction.

Maxon, LLC v. Funai Corp., 255 F.Supp.3d 711 (N.D. Ill. 2017), aff’d, 726 Fed.Appx. 797 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Successfully defended client at District Court, affirmed on appeal

Mariner IC LLC v. Funai Electric Co., Ltd., et al., Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-00105-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex.).

Successful; Case voluntarily dismissed in response to Rule 11 safe harbor letter.

Crypton Future Media, Inv. V. Hologram USA, Inc, et al.,

Case successfully resolved with client receiving a covenant not to sue.

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Craig Electronics, Inc.

Case dismissed against client

Navcom Technology Inc. and Deere & Co. v. Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd, et al.,

Jury Verdict for Client

USEI v. Samsung et al.,

Favorable settlement achieved for client.

Penovia LLC v. Oki Data Americas, Inc

Case dismissed prior to Answer

Telecomm Innovations, LLC v. Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd, et al.,

Achieved dismissal of the case prior to Answer.

In the Matter of Certain Printing and Imaging Devices and Components Thereof, USITC Inv. No. 337-TA-69

Client Prevailed

In the Matter of Certain Blu-Ray Disc Players, Components Thereof and Products Containing Same, USITC Inv. No. 337-TA-824

Resolved Favorably For Client

Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Brother Int’l Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 2:10-cv-03175 LDD (E.D. Pa.)

Currently stayed

FAS Technolgies, LLC v. Hirata Corporation, ICC Arbitration (Tokyo, Japan (2009))

Favorable settlement

Clontech v. Invitrogen, 263 F. Supp. 2d 780 (D. Del. 2003), aff’d-in-part and remanded, 406 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2005)

Client Prevailed

Enzo Life Sciences Inc. v. Digene Corp. v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., Civil Action No. 02-212 JJF (D. Del.)

Favorable Settlement

Life Technologies, Inc. v. Clontech Laboratories, Inc., Civil Action Nos. AW-96-4080 and AW-00-1879 (D. Md.)

Client prevailed

Biacore v. Thermo BioAnalysis Corp., 79 F.Supp.2d 422 (D. Del. 1999) aff’d, 2002 U.S. App. Lexis 13957 (Fed. Cir. 2002)

Client prevailed

Ajinomoto Co. v. Archer-Daniel-Midland Co., 228 F.3d 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2000), aff’g, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3833 (D. Del. 1998)

Client prevailed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

George Washington University National Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1991

California Institute of Technology

PhD - Doctorate

1986

New York University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2020

Lawline Annual Corporate & Securities Conference Drafting Effective Arbitration Agreements for International Transactions

2017

Hiroshima University Medical School Intellectual Property Seminar Series

Patenting and Licensing Discovery Tools Under U.S. Patent Law

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution