We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Janine is a registered U.S. patent attorney and has represented clients in bench and jury patent trials throughout the United States, and has particular expertise in Hatch-Waxman cases and International Trade Commission (ITC) Section 337 cases. She has first chair experience in numerous federal district court cases, and has been involved in patent cases covering diverse areas of technology including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, electronics, software, Internet content delivery, automotive, chemical, manufacturing, furniture and plastics processing.
1
Practice Area
28 years
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Maryland
Acquired: 2006
No misconduct found
State: District of Columbia
Acquired: 1999
No misconduct found
State: California
Acquired: 1998
No misconduct found
1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20036-5339
Not Yet Reviewed
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2010
One of the Most Powerful and Influential Women in the Region, National Diversity Council
2003 - Present
Partner, Arent Fox, LLP
2000 - 2003
Attorney, Shook Hardy & Bacon
1998 - 2000
Attorney, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro (Now Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman)
1995 - 1998
Regulatory Affairs Associate, FMC Corporation
1992 - 1995
R&D Facilitator, McNeil Consumer Products
1990 - 1992
Manufacturing Supervisor, Astra Zeneca
Member
Member
Member
1998
JD - Juris Doctor
1990
BS - Bachelor of Science
2012
Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and "My Witness Tweeted What?"
2012
2011
Common Interest Agreements: Dangerous Liaisons?
2010
Notable Decisions from the ITC
2010
Litigation with Multiple ANDA Filers
2009
2009
Implications of the Quanta v. LG Case
2008
Secondary Consideration Experts: The Clinician
2007
2003
Patentability of ‘Reach-Through’ Claims: US, European and Japanese Patent Office Perspectives
2005
2005
2005
2005
2005
2004
2004
Spanish