Janine A Carlan

Janine A Carlan

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.6

Licensed for 27 years

Litigation Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Litigation

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC

About Janine

Biography

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Litigation 100%

Expertise is in patent litigation throughout the United States in federal courts and also the International Trade Commission.

28 years

100%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 19 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 2006

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 26 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1999

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 27 years

State: California

Acquired: 1998

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Arent Fox LLP

1050 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20036-5339

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Janine A Carlan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Janine A Carlan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Janine

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.6 (Very Good)

Honors

2010

One of the Most Powerful and Influential Women in the Region, National Diversity Council

Work Experience

2003 - Present

Partner, Arent Fox, LLP

2000 - 2003

Attorney, Shook Hardy & Bacon

1998 - 2000

Attorney, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro (Now Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman)

1995 - 1998

Regulatory Affairs Associate, FMC Corporation

1992 - 1995

R&D Facilitator, McNeil Consumer Products

1990 - 1992

Manufacturing Supervisor, Astra Zeneca

Associations

State Bar of California

Member

District of Columbia Bar

Member

Maryland State Bar Association

Member

Education

1998

Widener University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1990

North Carolina State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2012

Litigation Section Event

Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and "My Witness Tweeted What?"

2012

IP Throughout the Drug Development Lifecycle: Opportunities and Challenges Post-Marketing IP Protection and Enforcement

2011

Litigation and Technology and Intellectual Property Section Event

Common Interest Agreements: Dangerous Liaisons?

2010

Domestic Impact of Intellectual Property in a Global Economy

Notable Decisions from the ITC

2010

Conference on Paragraph IV Disputes

Litigation with Multiple ANDA Filers

2009

Intellectual Property Section event

Implications of the Quanta v. LG Case

2008

Paragraph IV On Trial

Secondary Consideration Experts: The Clinician

2003

Advanced Forum on Biotech Patents

Patentability of ‘Reach-Through’ Claims: US, European and Japanese Patent Office Perspectives

Publications

2005

Pharma & Bio Ingredients Bioshield II: The proposed legislation includes controversial provisions for pharmaceutical companies

2005

Pharma & Bio Ingredients Vioxx: A Painful Decision

2005

Pharma & Bio Ingredients Two Key Decisions: The Merck and Purdue Cases Could Impact the Work of Every Pharmaceutical Researcher

2005

Pharma & Bio Ingredients Authorized Generics, Despite a Flurry of Activity, Controversy Continues to Surround the Category

2005

Pharma & Bio Ingredients IP Protection (in India and China) Intellectual Property Rights and Enforcement has been Troublesome for Decades, but Recent Dramatic Changes have Occurred

2004

FDLI Update New Medicare Law Brings New Considerations for “Paragraph IV Litigation

2004

Pharma & Bio Ingredients Hatch-Waxman, A look back after 20 years of regulation and a look ahead to pending provisions

Languages

Spanish

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution