No Photo

Smita Rao Dazzo

4.2
Rating: 6.3

Licensed for 15 years

Immigration Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Immigration, Litigation

1618 Monroe Street NW, Washington, DC

About Smita

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 14 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2011

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Maryland for 15 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 2011

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Catholic Charities Dc

1618 Monroe Street NW, Washington, DC, 20010

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Smita Rao Dazzo's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.2 /5.0

5 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (5) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | 1 star

Posted by anonymous | May 05, 2017 | Immigration

Smita was unprofessional

We were searching for the right immigration attorney who had a solid understanding of the process, the right experience and was professional. My husband went to the Catholic Charities consultation where he met Smita. She was thorough with the consult and provided a typed up document that lists the it...ems needed for our strategy meeting, should we decide to move forward. His initial hesitation was that she was concerned that we got married "too soon" and make inappropriate remarks about the legitimacy of our marriage. We initially thought she was being funny and ignored the comment. Despite the comment, we decided to hire Smita for her services, after the initial consultation. Smita was quick to respond with her availability and he set the appointment. She was hard to get in contact with the days leading up to the appointment and we were not able to reconfirm what was necessary for our strategy meeting via phone or email. We placed 2 phone calls and sent an email to inquire about confirming what is necessary. He went to the appointment and she was taken aback because I, the spouse, wasn't present. During the initial consultation, she did not clearly state this to my husband. When he was taking notes, she let him know that it wasn't necessary for him to write notes and that she was able to type them up for him. She even went as far as stating, "it's 2017, no one takes notes with pen and paper anymore." Smita arrived for the appointment at 9:10am (she was ten minutes late) and was not pleased to see just my husband. She stated that she did not feel comfortable moving forward becuase I wasn't there. He immediately sent me a text and I immediately called him to ask how we can still meet same day, since I had scheduled a client meeting the morning of the interview. After asking many questions about what options we had at this point, she was verbally combative. She mentioned that she had another meeting at 1:30pm and she had vacation right after that and she couldn't miss her lunch. She stated that we could reschedule with her in mid-June. He stated during the conversation that he was asking questions to make sure he knew what options we had. He stated that he tried to contact her about the appointment to make sure that he had everything that was required. He stated that he was trying to respectfully ask questions. He carried a calm tone with Smita, despite her getting more frustrated as he asked questions. Smita reemphasized that she was available mid-June and she gave him telephone numbers for other attorneys available. He asked if it was possible to hire an attorney and she responded yes and walked away. Smita was unprofessional and we did not use her for her services after the initial consultation.

See All Client Reviews

Smita Rao Dazzo's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Smita

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.3 (Good)

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution