Francis Christopher Mizzo

Francis Christopher Mizzo

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 25 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Washington, DC
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property, Litigation

655 Fifteenth Street, Washington, DC

About Francis

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 18 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 2007

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 25 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2000

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

655 Fifteenth Street, Washington, DC, 20005

Law Offices of Francis Christopher Mizzo

655 15th St Nw, Suite 1200, Washington, DC, 20005-5701

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Francis Christopher Mizzo's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

5 star 0
4 star 0
3 star 0
2 star 0
1 star 0

Francis Christopher Mizzo's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Francis

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

2009

U.S. Patent Case of the Year 2009 - Tafas v. Dudas, Managing Intellectual Property

Work Experience

2005 - Present

Partner, Kirkland & Ellis LLP A LAW FIRM SERVING GLOBAL CLIENTS

2004 - 2005

, The Honorable William J. Martini, U.S.D.J.

1999 - 2003

Associate, Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto

Associations

American Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Tafas v. Dudas, 511 F. Supp. 2d 652 (E.D. Va. 2007)

En banc appeal at the Federal Circuit pending.

Tafas v. Dudas, 541 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Va. 2008)

En banc appeal at the Federal Circuit pending.

Tafas v. Doll, 559 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Vacated. En banc appeal pending.

Tafas v. Doll, No. 08-1352 (Fed. Cir. July 6, 2009)

Obtained highly favorable resolution when USPTO withdrew its proposed rules that we had challenged..

GlaxoSmithKline and ViiV Healthcare v. Teva Pharmaceuticals

Obtained a favorable settlement after full discovery and GSK/ViiV asked the court for a preliminary injunction.

MPEG LA v. Multimedia Patent Trust et al.

Obtained a favorable settlement in the midst of trial.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1999

University of Virginia School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1996

Rutgers University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2008

15th Annual Kirkland & Ellis Technology & Law Seminar

The PTO's New Rules Are Void: GlaxoSmithKline v. Dudas -- Stories from the Front

2005

13th Annual ALI-ABA Trial of a Patent Case

Open Forum: Ask the Judges About Patent Litigation

Publications

2008

The Sedona Conference The USPTO's Proposed Rule Changes & GlaxoSmithKline's Challenge to the Rules

2002

New York Law Journal Unpublished Opinions Rising, But Do They Help?
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution