Columbus, OH
Immigration Lawyer at Columbus, OH
Practice Areas: Immigration
OUTCOME: Removal Proceedings Terminated
DHS initiated removal proceedings on the basis that Respondent was inadmissible when admitted as a permanent resident. The Judge ruled for Respondent following a trial on the issue.
OUTCOME: Removal Proceedings Terminated
DHS initiated removal proceedings on the basis of a criminal conviction. DHS attempted to rely on evidence not admissible for the purpose of establishing conviction in an immigration proceedings. Respo ... ndent filed a motion to terminate, arguing that admissible evidence do not establish a conviction which would result in removal. Immigration Judge ruled favorably on Respondent's motion to terminate, holding that DHS failed to establish removability by clear and convincing evidence.
OUTCOME: Removal Proceedings Terminated
Respondent was ordered removed by an Immigration Judge as a result of a conviction for an aggravated felony. The Board of Immigration Appeals granted Respondent's motion to terminate, terminating remov ... al proceedings on the basis of Section 237(a)(2)(A)(iv) of the INA.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
