Cleveland, OH
Employment and labor Lawyer at Cleveland, OH
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Business ... +4 more
OUTCOME: reversed in favor of client and remanded for trial
Age discrimination. Appeal brief on behalf of employee-appellant by Matthew Linehan and Chris Thorman; oral argument by Matthew Linehan. 6th Circuit reversed district court's grant of summary judgmen ... t because employee showed employer's "moving-target" reasons for termination appeared to be a pretextual "litigation strategy."
OUTCOME: affirmed in favor of client
Discovery / Attorney-Client Privilege. Appeal brief on behalf of employee-appellee by Matthew Linehan and Peter Hardin-Levine, oral argument by Mr. Linehan. 8th District affirmed trial court's denial ... of a employer's protective order where the employee demonstrated that the employer's documents had been altered during litigation and testimony related thereto was not protected by attorney-client or work product privileges.
OUTCOME: dismissed with prejudice in favor of client
Discovery / Motion to Dismiss. Matthew Linehan and Peter Hardin-Levine on behalf of employer. Upon employer's motion, employee's claims of employment discrimination were dismissed with prejudice for ... failure to prosecute and repeated failures to comply with discovery.
OUTCOME: jury verdict in favor of client
Jury Trial / Criminal. Matthew Linehan on behalf of defendant.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
