Carl W. Hittinger

Carl W. Hittinger

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 46 years

Antitrust and trade law Lawyer at Philadelphia, PA
Practice Areas: Antitrust & Trade Law, Litigation, Civil Rights

2929 Arch Street., Cira Centre, 12th floor, Philadelphia, PA

About Carl

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in District of Columbia for 36 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1989

Good Standing

No misconduct found

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 46 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1979

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Baker & Hostetler LLP

2929 Arch Street., Cira Centre, 12th floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Carl W. Hittinger's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Carl W. Hittinger's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Carl

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Associations

Pennsylvania Bar Association

Member

Pennsylvania Bar Association

Member

District of Columbia Bar

Member

American Bar Association

Member

Federal Bar Association

Member

Education

1979

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1976

Temple University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

1995

ABA Antitrust Law Section and Philadelphia Bar Association

Antitrust Fundamentals

1995

New Jersey Orthopedic Society Conference

Strategies for Economic Survival for the New Jersey Orthopedic Surgeon

Publications

2015

Bloomberg BNA FTC Provides Section 5 “Principles” But Little Clarity

2015

New Jersey Law Journal ‘Actavis’ Decision Not Limited to Cash Payments But Questions Still Remain

2015

New Jersey Law Journal Refusals to Deal Still at Issue in Celgene Case

2015

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Issues 'Enforcement Principles' Governing Competition Authority

2015

The Legal Intelligencer Ruling on Economic Favoritism Puts ‘NC Dental’ Back in Spotlight

2015

The Legal Intelligencer Patent Defeats Antitrust in Latest Test at Supreme Court

2015

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Failure to Adopt Section 5 Guidelines Still Hot-Button Issue

2015

The Legal Intelligencer Actavis Still Raising More Questions Than It Answers

2015

The Legal Intelligencer BakerHostetler Symposium Advances Debate Over FTC's Section 5 Enforcement Powers

2015

The Legal Intelligencer FTC's Appellate Win Reflects Focus On Health Care Consolidation

2014

The Legal Intelligencer A Minor Health Care Acquisition With Major Implications

2014

The Legal Intelligencer Terrell McSweeney: New Commissioner on the FTC Block

2014

The Legal Intelligencer A History of American Monopolists: Lessons Not Easily Learned

2014

The Legal Intelligencer A History of American Monopolists: Remembering One's Non-Monopoly Roots

2014

The Legal Intelligencer A History of American Monopolists: Being a Good Corporate Citizen

2014

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Aggressively Pressing 'Antitrust Trumps IP' Theme

2014

Federal Trade Commission Section 5 Policy, presentation, "The FTC: 100 Years of Antitrust and Competition Policy

2014

DLA Piper Webinar: Sherman Antitrust Act Versus Affordable Care Act: FTC's Successful Merger Challenge In the Matter of St. Luke's Hospital of Idaho

2014

BakerHostetler Clear Expectations: DOJ Outlines Tenets of an Effective Antitrust Compliance Program

2014

DELVACCA Health, Biotech & Pharma CLE Sherman Antitrust Act vs. Affordable Care Act: In the Matter of St. Luke's Hospital of Idaho

2013

The Legal Intelligencer U.S. Supreme Court Further Limits State Protection From Antitrust Laws

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Second Term: FTC One Commissioner Short; DOJ Pursues Beer Brewers

2013

Law360 A Big Year For Section 5 Of The FTC Act

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Criminal Antitrust Enforcement: A Review, a Look Ahead and A Change

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Supreme Court Antitrust Cases to Watch in 2013

2013

The Legal Intelligencer William Baer to Quarterback: The U.S. DOJ’s Antitrust Division

2013

58 Villanova Law Review 103 In re: K-Dur Antitrust Litigation: The Third Circuit’s Controversial Pay-for-Delay Antitrust Decision Splits with Other Circuit Courts

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Application of Antitrust Laws to Patent Cases Materially Altered

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Antitrust Enforcement in Health Care Gets Mixed Reviews

2013

The Legal Intelligencer Evolution of the Efficient-Market Hypothesis and the Law

2013

Bloombert BNA Antitrust & Trade Regulation Report Antitrust Alert: Supreme Court in Actavis - Analyze Reverse-Payment Settlements' Anticompetitive Effects Case by Case

2012

Law360 Novel Economic Expert Theories Have No Place In The Courtroom

2012

The Legal Intelligencer Antitrust Year in Review: The FTC at Full Throttle

2012

The Legal Intelligencer Antitrust Policy and the 2012 Presidential Election

2012

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Recalibrates Its Sights on Disgorgement of Profits

2012

The Legal Intelligencer The Antitrust Legacy of Judge Louis Pollak

2012

The Legal Intelligencer Health Care Mergers: Time for the Supreme Court to Jump In?

2012

The Legal Intelligencer Antitrust and Health Care: The Floodgates Have Opened

2012

The Legal Intelligencer Arbitrating Antitrust: Are Things Getting More Complicated

2012

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Preserves Status Quo in Long-Term Care Pharmacy Market

2011

The Legal Intelligencer Department of Justice Back in the Sherman Act Section 2 Business

2010

BNA Insights Antitrust Plaintiffs' Use of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) to Prove Causation and Damages: Revisiting Callahan and Stelwagon

2010

Pennsylvania Law Weekly Competition in Pennsylvania

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Experts Can Turn Tide in Class Certification

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Starr v. Sony BMG Music: Is the Twombly Tide Receding?

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Health Insurance Antitrust Exemption Temporarily Escapes Repeal

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Before Joining Bench, Stevens Molded Antitrust Law

2010

The Legal Intelligencer The Federal Pleading Standard: Questions Remain Regarding Dismissing Cases Based on 'Judicial Experience,' 'Common Sense'

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Non-Reportable Transactions No Longer Safe From Antitrust Scrutiny

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Rethinking Rebates in Predatory Pricing Cases

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Intel Settlement: A Precursor to the Battle Over Section 5 of the FTC Act

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Practicing as a Competition Lawyer in the 21st Century

2010

The Legal Intelligencer Third Circuit Sheds Further Light on Federal Pleadings Standards

2009

The Legal Intelligencer Section 5 of FTC Act on Collision Course with Existing Antitrust Law

2009

The Legal Intelligencer Retired Justice David Souter's Antitrust Legacy

2009

The Legal Intelligencer Justices to Consider Whether NFL Teams are Single Entity

2009

The Legal Intelligencer Sotomayor's Antitrust Decisions More in Line with Conservatives on Court

2009

The Legal Intelligencer High Court's Recent Linkline Decision Casts Doubt on Vitality of LePage's

2009

4 J. Bus. & Tech. L. 167 The Diminishing Role of the Private Attorney in General Antitrust and Securities Class Action Cases Aided by the Supreme Court

2006

The Legal Intelligencer The Antitrust Views of Roberts and Alito Are Still Unclear

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Proof and Pleading Standards to Be Further Reviewed By High Court

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Stay Tuned, as Federal Court Rejects Comcast's Antitrust Defenses

2006

The Legal Intelligencer The Antitrust Legacy of Judge Edward Becker

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Antitrust Bugs Are Multiplying in Corporate Boardrooms

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Unilateral Misconduct Under the Antitrust and Related Laws

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Supreme Court Decides its First Robinson-Patman Act Case in 12 Years

2006

The Legal Intelligencer Changing of the Guard at the FTC: Important Lessons to Be Learned

2006

Mid-Atlantic Executive Legal Advisor Creating a Level Playing Field: Using Antitrust Laws to Keep Your Competition in Line

2005

The Legal Intelligencer Alito's Conservative Views on Antitrust Issues

2005

The Legal Intelligencer FTC Wins Big Clayton Act Case in Chicago

2005

The Legal Intelligencer Changes as Well at the FTC and Antitrust Division

2005

The Legal Intelligencer Where Does High Court Nominee John Roberts Stand on Antitrust Issues?

2005

The Legal Intelligencer Supreme Court to Decide First Robinson-Patman Act Case in a Decade

2005

General Counsel Mid-Atlantic Antitrust High Stakes: Companies That Don't Have a Compliance Program Risk Paying the Price

2005

The Legal Intelligencer 3rd Circuit Sends Strong Message to Monopolists

2005

The Legal Intelligencer FTC in the Batter's Box Again on Hospital Mergers

2005

Mid-Atlantic Executive Legal Advisor Antitrust Compliance For the Masses

2004

The Legal Intelligencer 3rd Circuit Offers Insight Into Sherman Act Sec. 1 Claim Proofs
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution