Geoffrey Joseph Spreter's Legal Cases (4)

Energy and utilities

2007 San Diego Wildfire Litigation

N/A

OUTCOME: Mr. Spreter represented over 300 clients, resulting in over $55 million dollars in settlements.

The San Diego Superior Court appointed the firm as the Single Enterprise Liability Discovery Coordinator during this action. As part of the Single Enterprise Liability team, Mr. Spreter personally depo ... sed twelve senior Sempra Energy and SDG&E corporate officers, including the President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director of Corporate Strategy for Sempra Energy. His firm was also named to the trial team in this matter.

Energy and utilities

2011 Caughlin Ranch Fire Litigation

N/A

OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement

The Caughlin Ranch Fire was ignited by power lines and caused the destruction of more than 30 homes, burned over 2,000 acres, and caused the evacuation of 10,000 residents of Reno, Nevada. The court ap ... pointed Spreter Law Firm as co-lead counsel for the individual litigation. The Spreter Law Firm and its co-counsel were able to reach a confidential settlement on behalf of 57 fire victims.

Class action

In re: Lenovo Adware Litigation

N/A

OUTCOME: Pending

The Spreter Law Firm and its co-counsel filed the first case, Bennet v. Lenovo, Inc. et al., Case No. 3:15-CV-00368, against Defendant Lenovo, Inc. and Superfish, Inc. for placing spyware on Lenovo com ... puters, which allegedly violated consumer protection and computer trespass statutes. This spyware created a fake security-certificate that left consumer’s computers potentially vulnerable to cyber-attacks and hackers. The matter is currently pending as part of a consolidated proceeding in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

White collar crime

Gray v. Talk Fusion, Inc., et al.

N/A

OUTCOME: Pending

The firm recently filed a case against Talk Fusion, an alleged multi-level marketing company, that offers a business opportunity to sell supposed patent-pending cutting edge video-conferencing technolo ... gy. The complaint alleges that the company operates as an illegal pyramid scheme in violation of Federal and California state law. The matter is currently pending in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained