No Photo

Martha Sperling

3.5
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 46 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Doylestown, PA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Civil Rights, Discrimination

87 N. Broad Street, Doylestown, PA

About Martha

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Pennsylvania for 46 years

State: Pennsylvania

Acquired: 1979

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Eastburn & Gray, PC

87 N. Broad Street, Doylestown, PA, 18901

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Martha Sperling's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.5 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 1
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Character & Conduct

Posted by anonymous | June 16, 2013

Caveat Emptor .... BEWARE .....

The title is written in Latin because I believe that it is fitting for an attorney. I also feel that most people understand the meaning or have at least saw the episode of The Brady Bunch that shows where Greg purchased a used car and learned the meaning real quick. Caveat Emptor; "Let the Buyer Bewa...re". The biggest mistake made with this attorney is to call on her to meet with her. After that it is all downhill from there. It doesn't start bad, in fact, on the contrary. She sells herself very well and is very knowledgeable. She starts by telling you why she is worth a higher percentage than the normal. She believes that she is worth more than the normal 33% Contingency Fee that is an industry standard. In reality, she is not worth the standard. She tries to increase the possibility of a higher settlement through the utilization of extra spending. She does not mind spending on experts and reports and the like. Of course the client pays for all of her overspending which is just a way to make up for her lack of abilities. This is something that even someone representing theirself can do. Spend money on every opportunity to make your case look good and then sell the appearance than the actual facts and you win on that basis.My situation with this attorney did not start till a year or two after initially hiring her. In fact it was even longer because she did not even prepare the filing till the last week of the deadline. Did you know a case can be filed right after the incident? Part of the reason for cases taking so long is the attorney waiting two years before even filing. Sure they do a little of this and a little of that, but the case doesn't get started until the actual filing. So here is one important piece of information when speaking to this attorney and in fact probably all. NEVER, NEVER, speak on the phone or in person without the conversation being recorded. Something that took me a couple calls to realize was that when the attorney, this one, was calling me to speak to me it was because she did not want the conversation on record. She emailed all the time to keep records of everything but she called when she wanted to manipulate the situation. Fortunately for me I picked up on this early and recorded all of our conversations and kept a journal of each call. Each and every email was put in to a file and a journal of them was organized as well. Being disabled I depended on this attorney. I entrusted her and I left myself vulnerable to a degree. Sure I kept track of everything but my disability had gotten so severe that I was not able to seek a malpractice suit or remedy against her. Keep close track of expenses and do not allow for overspending. If things are getting out of hand take it to your Judge that is handling your case. What I mean by getting out of hand is let's say you provide approval for an expense at say $500 for something the case could use and then the cost comes back after the purchase at say $750. That is unacceptable as it is an increase of 50%. A ten percent difference could be considered okay but anything higher, your attorney is either ripping you off or taking advantage. Both of which are unacceptable morally and otherwise. While I have worked with many attorneys in my life, I have found that they are of a different breed. It takes a special person to be an attorney. That is needed in order to litigate effectively but you don't want what some would believe to be unscrupulous values to be against you, yourself, the client. Always check for reviews for any attorney. Check the Better Business Bureau. Be sure the attorney is in good standing with the Bar Association. If the interview or the contract signing has anything to do with a raise before even starting, bail out and move on to the next. Industry norms are there for all. All attorneys have a great track record and if the state felt that their percentage should be higher than they wouldn't be where they are set at now.

See All Client Reviews

Martha Sperling's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Martha

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution