State v. Langston, 229 SW3d 289 (Mo. App. S.D. 2007)
Jul 26, 2007OUTCOME: Judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial
Defendant was convicted of committing the class C felony of stealing in violation of § 570.030 RSMo (2000). Her conviction was based upon a verdict-directing instruction which hypothesized that she cou ... ld be convicted of felony stealing if "the property so taken had a value of at least Five Hundred Dollars. . . ." One of the points she advances on appeal is that the submission of this instruction was plain error because it improperly allowed jurors to convict Defendant of felony stealing without finding that she had appropriated property worth at least $750, as required by the substantive law in effect at the time of the alleged offense. This Court agrees. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial.