Waldron v. Holder, 688 F.3d 354, 360 (8th Cir. 2012)
Aug 06, 2012OUTCOME: Petition for Review Granted
Waldron petitined for review, arguing that the BIA erred by analyzing Waldron's waiver application under an “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” standard. Waldron also contends that the BIA fai ... led to apply the proper standard of review to the IJ's factual findings and engaged in improper factfinding. We agree with Waldron that the BIA failed to review the IJ's factual findings for clear error, and we remand for further proceedings.
