Jacqueline Fox v. Johnson & Johnson
Mar 01, 2016OUTCOME: $72,000,000
Jacqueline Fox died of ovarian cancer at the age of 62 after a lifetime of usage of Johnson's Baby Powder for feminine hygiene.
Saint Louis, MO
Defective and dangerous products Lawyer at Saint Louis, MO
Practice Areas: Defective and Dangerous Products, Litigation, Personal Injury
OUTCOME: $72,000,000
Jacqueline Fox died of ovarian cancer at the age of 62 after a lifetime of usage of Johnson's Baby Powder for feminine hygiene.
OUTCOME: $4.700,000
A child accidentally wrapped the cord from a household product around his neck, causing a loss of oxygen to the brain and mild brain injury.
OUTCOME: $2,400,000
The fuel from a household product escaped from the reservoir, owing to a defect, resulting in burns to the plaintiff
OUTCOME: $650,000,000
As a leader in the Firm's Pharmaceutical Litigation Team, the firm acted as Liaison Counsel in the Pradaxa Muti-District litigation, bringing the case to a successful resolution for $650 million
OUTCOME: $1,290,000
Client fell from the roof of a building on a construction site, resulting in multiple fractures.
OUTCOME: $1,250,000
Child died on a common household product.
OUTCOME: Guardian ad litem appointed and injunction entered. Upheld on appeal in unanimous decision of the Illinois Fifth District Appellate Court.
Action brought on behalf of developmentally disablsed residents of Warren G. Murray Developmental Center, Centralia, Illinois, who were subject to guardianship of the Illinois Office of State Guardian ... to limit the State Guardian's authority to dictate residential placement where the State Guardian had a conflict of interest in assessing best interest of its wards with respect to residential placements and residential transfers. Appointment of guardian ad litem obtained and injunction entered precluding residential transfers. In an action arising from a decision of the State of Illinois to close a facility housing developmentally disabled adults and transfer those persons to community-integrated living arrangements, the appellate court held that petitioners met the criteria of being an “interested person” for purposes of section 23-2 of the Probate Act and had standing to bring their action, and neither the fact that all of the wards involved in petitioners’ challenge were subjects of other pending probate proceedings, nor the respondents’ claim that the powers of the temporary guardian ad litem appointed by the trial court, including the power to give a final consent to the transfer of any wards at issue, exceeded the permissible scope of a guardian ad litem’s duties required that the preliminary injunction against implementation of the decision had to be dissolved.
OUTCOME: $2,300,000
The tire on a Commercial Vehicle exploded, causing the vehicle to lose control, killing the driver.