Deferred Action for DREAMers
Dec 28, 2012OUTCOME: Granted
Multiple cases approved for Deferred Action for Dreamers.
Immigration Lawyer
Practice Areas: Immigration
OUTCOME: Granted
Multiple cases approved for Deferred Action for Dreamers.
OUTCOME: Granted
Prepared and filed K-1 visa for client from Belarus. K-1 visa was granted. Form I-485 green card application was filed and approved after client entered the U.S. and married U.S. citizen spouse.
OUTCOME: Granted
Prepared an E-1 visa for my client based on his upcoming importing of goods from Italy to the U.S. The visa was approved by the U.S. Embassy in Rome for two years.
OUTCOME: Granted
Client's waiver was granted by USCIS in Cd. Juarez. Client had to establish that his U.S. citizen spouse would suffer extreme hardship if the waiver was not granted.
OUTCOME: Approved
Client was a victim of a crime in Minneapolis, MN and reported the crime to law enforcement. Client was granted a 4 year visa with a work permit. Client will be eligible to apply for lawful permanent r ... esident status in 3 years.
OUTCOME: Granted
Client's extraordinary ability petition was granted and client was issued lawful permanent resident status.
OUTCOME: Asylum granted
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the Immigration Judge's order reopening proceedings and terminating the grant of asylum. The Eighth Circuit remanded the case with directions to reinstate th ... e asylum order. The Eighth Circuit held that the Immigration Judge abused his discretion in reopening the removal proceedings because the Department of Homeland Security failed to show that the evidence upon which the motion to reopen was based was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the former hearing where petitioners were granted asylum.
OUTCOME: Client was released from ICE custody
After the U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) had detained Mr. Bah for 891 days (approximately 2.5 years), the U.S. District Court of Minnesota granted Mr. Bah’s petition for writ of habeas ... corpus and ordered his release from ICE custody. Mr. Bah argued that his continued detention was unlawful under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001), which held that the statutory provision governing detention of aliens subject to removal orders does not authorize indefinite detention. The District Court agreed and found that Mr. Bah established that he had been detained for more than six unencumbered months after his removal order became final and that his removal is not significantly likely in the reasonably foreseeable future. Mr. Bah was released from custody on May 4, 2007 pursuant to the District Court’s order and is actively pursuing his application for adjustment of status before the Immigration Court.