Halsey Automotive Imports, Inc. v. Schmidt, et al., Multnomah County Case No. 1303-03769
Sep 30, 2014
OUTCOME: Verdict for Defendants
Represented defendants in dispute relating to small, family-owned business. Defended claims alleging (1) unfair competition, (2) violation of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and (3) breach of fiduciary ...duty. Claims successfully defended on summary judgment and at trial.
Commercial real estate
Raz Entertainment, Inc. v. Robert L. Pfeiffer, et al., Multnomah County Case No. 1208-11059
Mar 31, 2014
OUTCOME: Court Denial of Attempt to Garnish Debt Payment Stream
Successfully defended creditor from garnishment issued against debt obligation payment stream. Dispute related to complex judgment and commercial paper issues.
Commercial real estate
Field Turf Builders, et al. v. FieldTurf Tarkett USA Holdings, Inc., et al., U.S. Dist. Ct. Case No. 03:09-CV-671-HZ (D. Or.),
Jan 01, 2011
OUTCOME: Verdict for Plaintiffs
Role: Mr. Currie acted as co-counsel on this case, representing plaintiffs through discovery and summary judgment, however, Mr. Currie did not participate in trial. ----------------
Facts: Field Turf ...USA (“FTUSA”) is an Oregon business, who manufactured synthetic grass turf, and was a 5% minority owner of Field Turf Builders, LLC (“FTB”), who leased to FTUSA the use of their Wilsonville, OR, facility along with some equipment and business records. FTUSA and FTB were entertaining the idea of a merger, but FTUSA became nervous after discovering that the IRS had imposed a lien against FTB for unpaid taxes. Believing that the leased facility might be seized by the IRS, FTUSA removed all of FTB’s equipment and business records from the facility. FTUSA eventually returned some of FTB’s files, but nothing else. Amongst other claims, FTB filed a trade secret claim against FTUSA for misappropriation of FTB’s customer lists, contacts, and other proprietary information.