Wisconsin -v- David Gullickson
Feb 14, 2008OUTCOME: Reversed.
Gullickson was stopped for drunk driving after slightly crossing the lane line while being followed by police. While being represented by other counsel, Gullickson was convicted for refusing to submit ... to a drunk driving test. On appeal, Gullickson (Wood) argued that the stop was illegal, therefore the evidence from that stop (including the refusal) could not be used against Gullickson to convict him on a drunk driving charge, hence he was not guilty. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals concurred - the fruits of an illegal stop cannot be used as evidence, and absent that evidence, there was no case against Gullickson and he could not be convicted. The convicted was reversed.
