During his military career, Bruce White handled thousands of court-martial cases. Many cases were at the general court-martial (felony) level and were fully contested. Many defense clients received n...ot guilty findings, case dismissals, or a radical reduction from the original charged offenses.
Military law
Military Administrative Law
May 01, 2008
OUTCOME: Favorable for clients
Bruce White handled thousands of administrative separations, administrative reductions, NJP, BOI, BCNR fitness report corrections, claims against the government, and veteran's benefits during his Marin...e Corps career.
Military law
United States v. Staff Sergeant D
Jun 15, 2007
OUTCOME: Client received military retirement
U.S. v. SSgt D, 65 M.J. 562 (NMCCA 2006). In 2000, SSgt D USMC was preparing for a general court-martial with his attorney, Captain Richard Armstrong USMC. After the Article 32 investigation and prior ...to the trial, the Staff Judge Advocate at MCAS Miramar, CA, unilaterally reassigned Captain Armstrong within the Miramar office, severing the attorney-client relationship. SSgt D requested that then Lieutenant Colonel Bruce White USMC, the senior defense counsel at Camp Pendleton, defend him at his pending trial.
For the trial, the Commanding General placed very senior members on the panel (jury). The panel included mostly sitting 0-5 and 0-6 commanding officers and command Sergeants Major. Bruce White filed motions attacking the severance of the Armstrong-SSgt D attorney-client relationship and also for "court stacking." Despite White's vigorous arguments, Judge Folsom denied both motions. The very senior panel convicted SSgt D and gave him a Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD). At the time of trial, he had 16 years of stellar service, including service in combat.
In 2006, the Navy-Marine Court of Criminal Appeals (NMCCA) completely agreed with Bruce White's original severance motion. The Court found that the Miramar SJA wrongfully severed the Armstrong-SSgt D attorney-client relationship. NMCCA fully reversed the case and remanded it for retrial at Miramar. NMCCA did not need to address the court stacking issue, which also may have caused reversal. SSgt D then returned to active duty and again requested that then Colonel Bruce White defend him. The request was granted, and SSgt D and Bruce White began preparing for the retrial.
In 2007, the government opted to dismiss the criminal case and settled the case administratively. By this time, the client had 22 years of service and was able to retire.
The case set important published precedent on the sanctity of the attorney-client relationship in the military. See U.S. v. SSgt D, 65 M.J. 562 (NMCCA 2006).
Military law
United States v. Lance Corporal S
Jun 01, 2000
OUTCOME: Murder case dismissed.
Lance Corporal S was a first time mother. In an absolute tragedy, her newborn son bled to death due to medical complications during his first night home from the hospital. The government charged Lanc...e Corporal S with murder under a wanton disregard theory for failing to provide timely medical support to her newborn baby. Bruce White worked with civilian lead counsel and co-military counsel on this case. The defense team conducted an aggressive two-week UCMJ Article 32 hearing that uncovered a number of glaring problems with the government's case. Based on the convincing defense effort at the Article 32 hearing, the government dismissed the entire case.