Law Theatrical Arts v. Giordano
Feb 28, 2014OUTCOME: Judgment for $3,612,438.35
Breach of agreement related to a production facility at the Fashion Show Mall.
Michael Brian Lee's Legal Cases (14)
Las Vegas, NV
Business Lawyer at Las Vegas, NV
Practice Areas: Business, Contracts & Agreements ... +3 more
Artec v. GWE
Feb 27, 2014OUTCOME: Judgment for $1,072,438.35
Breach of a loan and security agreement.
WORLD MARKET CENTER v GLOBAL ACCENTS, INC., 2:10-cv-00661-RCJ-RJJ (US District Court, Nevada) (Represented Global Accents)
Jan 07, 2014OUTCOME: Defense Verdict, Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs on Counterclaims
The underlying matter arose out of a landlord tenant dispute regarding the payment of rent, and the fraud committed by the former collection agency, Shushok & McCoy, Inc. employed by Plaintiff. The sub ... stantive issue of fact related to the scope of Shushok’s authority to enter into a settlement agreement with Global Accents on behalf of Plaintiff, and whether Global Accents’ reliance was both objectively and subjective reasonable that Shushok had such authority. After a bench trial, the court found Judgment in favor for Global Accents’ counterclaim for breach of contract claim against World Market Center and awarded attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses. Judgment also in favor of Global Accents, and against Plaintiff, as to all of Plaintiff’s claims against Global Accents.
HUMICLEAR, LLC. v. ECOROQ et al., A-13-676669
Mar 08, 2013OUTCOME: Stipulated Injunction
This case involves the alleged misappropriation of trade secrets and other confidential information by Defendants. Defendants allegedly obtained trade secrets and other confidential information that t ... hey had unused in unfair competition. HumiClear filed suit and sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. Before the hearing, Parties agreed to a stipulated injunction for 21 months prohibiting Defendants from engaging in competition, solicitation, and/or disparagement of HumiClear with a monetary sanction for each infraction.
STATE v. GRAFF
Jan 28, 2013OUTCOME: Reversed on Appeal, Dismissed Without Remand
Successfully had a conviction for battery domestic violence overturned on appeal, resulting in a complete dismissal of the case.
STATE v. PETERSEN
Oct 05, 2012OUTCOME: Dismissal
Successfully dismissed charges of attempted murder and battery domestic violence.
TMMI Shareholder Derivative Action - A-11-641114-C
Aug 10, 2012OUTCOME: TRO Granted, Defendants Removed from Board
Initially starting as a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Defendants for breaching their fiduciary duties to TMMI through the misappropriation of corporate funds, shareholders moved to compel a sh ... areholder meeting to elect new officers. Shareholders were successful and removed Defendants as officers of the company. Thereafter, TMMI adopted the litigation. During the litigation, TMMI successfully obtained more than $10,000 in sanctions against Fernandez. TMMI successfully defaulted the original board members after lengthy litigation for abusive discovery practices.
TMM, INC. v. INVESTORSPIPELINE.NET, LTD et al., A-12-654739-C
Apr 13, 2012OUTCOME: Confidential Settlement Agreement
TMMI sued Defendant for fraudulent misrepresentations to TMMI regarding certain proprietary processes for the compression and streaming of media over the internet. TMMI successfully obtained a tempora ... ry restraining order against Defendants from them divesting themselves of their stock in TMMI. Shortly thereafter, the Parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement.
Cashman Photo v. Finkel, 270 P.3d 1259 (Nev. 2012)
Jan 27, 2012OUTCOME: Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part
Former employer brought action against former employee alleging breach of consulting agreement and seeking a preliminary injunction to enforce the agreement's restrictive covenants. The District Court ... granted injunction. Employee exercised his right to terminate agreement and moved to dissolve injunction, but the District Court denied motion. Employee appealed from both orders. Supreme Court upheld that the issuance of the preliminary injunction was appropriate pursuant to contractual restrictive covenants and the Uniform Trade Secret Act; however, remand was necessary to determine whether former employer's contracts, customer lists, process, and prices remained protected as trade secrets. If so, further findings were necessary as to how long Finkel should be restrained from deriving a commercial advantage from his misappropriation.
Smith v. Mahoney's Silver Nugget, 265 P.3d 688 (Nev. 2011)
Nov 23, 2011OUTCOME: Affirmed
Estate of deceased casino patron brought action against casino alleging negligence, wrongful death, and loss of consortium after patron was fatally shot in an altercation at casino lounge. The District ... Court granted Mahoney’s Silver Nugget summary judgment. Estate appealed. The Supreme Court held that shooting was not foreseeable so as to hold casino liable.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
