Gary L. Leonard's Legal Cases (5)

Appeals

Mattox v. Grimes County, 389 S.W.3d 464 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 Dist.] 2012)

Sep 25, 2012

OUTCOME: The COA reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the County and remanded the case to the trial court for further action.

This case involved a controversy between the Grimes County Commissioners' Court and my client regarding the status of an alleged roadway dedication across the southern boundary of his property. This ... particular appeal was the second of two appeals caused by the trial court's granting the County's motion for summary judgment and denying my client's motion.

Appeals

Intex Livingspace, Ltd. v. Roset USA Corp. (Tex. App., 2011)

Apr 19, 2011

OUTCOME: The COA overturned and dismissed the injunction.

This was a case involving a dispute between a foreign furniture manufacturer and its Houston Distributor. The appeal involved the wrongful granting of a Temporary Injunction.

Appeals

Mattox v. Jackson, 336 S.W.3d 759 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.] 2011)

Feb 03, 2011

OUTCOME: The COA overturned and dismissed the injunction.

This case involved a controversy between a neighboring property owner and my client regarding the status of an alleged roadway dedication across the southern boundary of his property. This particula ... r appeal involved the wrongful granting of a Temporary Injunction by the court.

Appeals

Mattox v. Grimes County, 305 S.W.3d 375 (Tex.App.-Houston [14 Dist.] 2010)

Jan 28, 2010

OUTCOME: The COA reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the County and remanded the case to the trial court for further action.

This case involved a controversy between the Grimes County Commissioners' Court and my client regarding the status of an alleged roadway dedication across the southern boundary of his property. This ... particular appeal was the first of two appeals caused by the trial court's granting the County's motion for summary judgment and denying my client's motion.

Appeals

Prince v. First City Bank, 853 S.W.2d 691 (Tex.App. —Houston [1 Dist.] 1993)

May 06, 1993

OUTCOME: The COA reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of the bank and rendered judgment for my client on his motion for summary judgment.

This case involved the attempt to collect a debt by the bank. The debt was noncollectable because the statute of limitations had run. The bank obtained a summery judgment against my client by claiming ... that it was entitled to use a six year federal statute of limitations.

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

The Avvo Rating explained