Minneapolis, MN
Employment and labor Lawyer at Minneapolis, MN
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Class Action, Consumer Protection
OUTCOME: Settlement
Class action settlement for distributors who challenged their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME: Conditional class certification
Conditional class certification granted in class action brought by distributors who are challenging their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME: Settlement of up to $15 million for class members
Class action settlement awarding a maximum of $15 million for class members who received unsolicited text messages in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act; settlement affirmed (8th Cir. 2 ... 017)
OUTCOME: Conditional class certification
Conditional class certification granted in class action brought by distributors who are challenging their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME: Conditional class certification
Conditional class certification granted in class action brought by distributors who are challenging their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME: Conditional class certification
Conditional class certification granted in class action brought by distributors who are challenging their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME: Conditional class certification
Conditional class certification granted in class action brought by distributors who are challenging their classification by Flowers Foods as independent contractors, rather than employees
OUTCOME:
Defendant’s summary judgment motion denied in part where genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether employee was wrongfully terminated as a result of employer’s discrimination on the basis of ... race and sexual orientation.
OUTCOME:
Defendant’s summary judgment motion denied where genuine issues of material fact existed as to whether plaintiff was adequately performing her job duties and as to whether defendant’s reasons for termi ... nation were pretext for age discrimination and retaliation.
OUTCOME:
Denial of defendant's motion for summary judgment where plaintiff proferred sufficient evidence from which a reasonable fact finder could infer that employer did not retain her because of disability an ... d failed to accommodate her disability.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
