Hallock, MN
Elder law Lawyer at Hallock, MN
Practice Areas: Elder Law, Estate Planning ... +3 more
OUTCOME: Court award the surgery as reasonable, necessary, and related to the work injury.
Employee (client) Omdahl sustained work-related back injury and needed back surgery. Employer/insurer refused to pay.
OUTCOME: Court awarded a change of physician and granted the second surgery for our client
Client (Peterson) suffered a back injury at work. Employer/insurer ultimately required back surgery, but ended up needing a second surgery. Employer/insurer refused to agree to a change of physician ... and the second surgery.
OUTCOME: Contractor demanded $75,000. Jury sided with our client and awarded only $9,600.
Defense of watershed. Contractor sued watershed district over what it claimed was a breech of a previous settlement agreement entered into between the parties due to contractor's previous alleged sub ... -standard performance.
OUTCOME: Our client (Kittson County) had no obligation to pay since certain conditions of the guarantee were not met.
To assist economic development, County guaranteed loan to dairy, but with certain conditions. Dairy failed to pay, guarantor claimed, and dairy sued county.
OUTCOME: Court ruled that our client was entitled to the land at the original price set in the option.
Client leased farmland with option to buy at specific price. Owner attempted to sell the land to third party for considerably more. Client sued for specific performance.
OUTCOME: The federal court found for our client (Valley Tissue) and the case was sent back to state court.
In a garden variety boundary line claim, defendants tried to remove the case to federal court, alleging 5th and 7th Amendment claims. Our clients alleged the case had no federal jurisdiction.
OUTCOME: Our clients were allowed to search for assets and attempt to show the assets were purchased with money traced to the conversion of commodities by Big H.
Clients (all farmers) together with the U.S. Attorney sought to track down commodity proceeds converted by Big H. and allegedly fraudulently transferred to the criminal defendant's wife in their divorc ... e.
OUTCOME: Insurance proceeds went to our client.
Business partnership division between two brothers. The opposing party died during the split. The partnership had life insurance. Our client was the beneficiary. Decedent's estate opposed distribut ... ion of the proceeds to our client.
OUTCOME: Succeeded in protecting client's assets.
Personal injury defense action where one insured denied coverage. On appeal the court determined coverage was available.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
