State v. Gomes
Feb 14, 2023OUTCOME: Defendant won appeal
Appeal to the Supreme Court of New Jersey on the question of client's eligibility for Pretrial Intervention program in light of recent reforms of New Jersey's cannabis laws
Hackensack, NJ
Criminal defense Lawyer at Hackensack, NJ
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Defendant won appeal
Appeal to the Supreme Court of New Jersey on the question of client's eligibility for Pretrial Intervention program in light of recent reforms of New Jersey's cannabis laws
OUTCOME: Favorable for Mr. Gorman's client: Reversed and final restraining order vacated
At a hearing where both parties were not represented by counsel, the Family Part of the Superior Court issued a final restraining order against K.T. Scott represented K.T. on appeal, arguing that the F ... amily Part erred by issuing that restraining order.
OUTCOME: Favorble outcome for Mr. Gorman's client: Final restraining order vacated; matter remanded for a new hearing
Defendant appealed the issuance of a final restraining order and the denial of her reconsideration motion and motion to vacate default.
OUTCOME: Favorable for defendant: Remanded for resentencing
Defendant had been sentenced to a two-year term of probation with a condition that 364 days be served in a county jail. That sentence was reversed and on remand, the sentencing court was instructed to ... consider the suitability of community service.
OUTCOME: Favorable Outcome for Mr. Gorman's Client
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division reversed a Final Restraining Order entered against Mr. Gorman's client who allegedly ran over the foot of his estranged spouse.
OUTCOME: Favorable Outcome for Mr. Gorman's Client
The New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that defendant's motion to suppress should have been granted because officer engaged in unlawful search.