Amarillo, TX
Litigation Lawyer at Amarillo, TX
Practice Areas: Litigation, Personal Injury, Business
OUTCOME:
Swift & Company v. Immigration And Customs Enforcement Division Of The Department Of Homeland Security And Julie L. Myers, 2006. Kevin represented a meat packing plant trying to get a TRO to get ICE t ... o not invade their plant even though they lost.
OUTCOME:
A huge fire that burned over $1M panhandle acres and killed 12-13 people and they represented the 4 sixes ranch TCU has part of their royalties.
OUTCOME:
The beef market suffered substantial losses following the Oprah Winfrey Show broadcast, several Texas cattle ranchers sued Oprah Winfrey, the producers and distributors of the Oprah Winfrey Show, and H ... oward Lyman, a guest on the show, in Texas state court. The cattlemen alleged violations of the Texas False Disparagement of Perishable Food Products Act, Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. § 96.001-.004 ("the Act"), and damages arising from the common-law torts of business disparagement, defamation, negligence, and negligence per se.
OUTCOME:
Plaintiffs Texas Beef Group, Perryton Feeders, Inc., Maltese Cross Cattle Company, Bravo Cattle Company, Alpha 3 Cattle Company, Paul F. Engler, Cactus Feeders, Inc., Cactus Growers Inc., and Dripping ... Springs Cattle Company sue Defendants Oprah Winfrey, Harpo Productions, Inc., and Howard Lyman alleging causes of action for: (1) False disparagement of perishable food products, in violation of Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 96.002; (2) common law business disparagement; (3) common law defamation; and (4) negligence and negligence per se.[1] The cause of action arises out of an Oprah Winfrey show taped on April 11, 1996, and aired on April 16, 1996, which included a segment on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE).
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
