Arroyo v. Altemp Alloys
Dec 27, 2012OUTCOME: Dismissed with prejudice
Plaintiff, a machinist for an aerospace and defense parts manufacturing company, developed lung disease as a result of alleged exposure to various chemicals and metal dust at his workplace. Our office ... took over from the client’s personal business counsel shortly after a Second Amended Complaint was filed. A review of the allegations in the Complaint, First Amended Complaint and Second Amended Complaint showed that Plaintiff had changed the factual allegations against our client, a national manufacturer and distributor of metal ingots. Initially, Plaintiff alleged that the metal ingots provided by the client were defective in that they caused his lung disease. However, the Second Amended Complaint alleged that an oil based product was applied to the metal ingots, which caused the lung disease, rather than the metal ingot themselves. The office filed a demur based upon the “Sham Pleading Doctrine” which was sustained without leave to amend.
