Cole v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 359 Md. 298; 753 A.2d 533 (2000)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Reported decision from the highest court in Maryland in which Mr. Hansel's arguments succeeded in making it easier for people to recover fair compensation from their insurance companies.

Wells, et al. v. Chevy Chase Bank, et al., 363 Md. 232; 768 A.2d 620 (2001) (amicus curie)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Mr. Hansel represented the Maryland Trial Lawyer's Trial Association in a case in which he successfully persuaded the Court to adopt a new standard for the enforceability of arbitration clauses.

Moore v. Norouzi, 371 Md. 154; 807 A.2d 632 (2002) (amicus curie)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Mr. Hansel represented the Maryland Trial Lawyer's Trial Association in a case in which he was successful in persuading the Court to lower the standard for compliance with the Tort Claims Act.

LGB Group LLC v. John Booty, 2004 MDBT 1 (Cir. Ct. for Prince George's Co., 1/28/04)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

In one of the first trial court opinions reported under Maryland Rule 16-205, Mr. Hansel obtained a significant verdict for business partners defrauded by a former partner.

Prince George's County v. Longtin, 190 Md. App. 97 (2010)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Mr. Hansel persuaded the Court of Special Appeals to uphold a verdict which resulted in th eeventual collection of $7.5 Million.

Prince George's County v. Longtin, 419 Md. 450 (2011)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Mr. Hansel's arguments lead to the adoption of a new cause of aciton in Maryland, opening a new avenue for fair recovery by victims of civil rights violations.

Jones v. State, 38 A.3d 333 (2012)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client

Mr. Hansel succeeded in persuading the Court of Appeals that it is not necessary for plaintiffs to present expert testimony in civil rights cases, making it easier for victims of unconstitutional mistr ... eatment to recover fair compensation.

Brooks, et al. v. Jenkins, et ux., 103 A.3d 899 (2014)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client.

Rodriguez v. State, No. 0748, Sept. Term, 2012 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2014)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client.

Cooper v. Rodriguez, 118 A. 3d 829 (MD Court of Appeals 2015)

N/A

OUTCOME: Victory for Mr. Hansel's client.