Stuart v. Weisflog, 2008 WI 22

N/A

OUTCOME: Appeal

This case involves the interpretation and application of the Home Improvement Practices Act (HIPA), which is contained in Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 110 (Oct., 2004)3 (ATCP 110), and Wis. Stat. § 100.2 ... 0(5) (2003-04).

Progressive Northern Insurance Co. v. Hall, 2006 WI 13

N/A

OUTCOME: Supreme Court Appeal

The insurance companies disputed which of them is primary, that is, which is liable to pay the first $100,000 under the uninsured motorist coverage set forth in their respective policies.

Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89

N/A

OUTCOME:

In Wisconsin, underinsured motorist policies written in the amount of $25,000 have been held to be illusory contracts, and case law has required insurers to pay damages, up to the $25,000 limit of any ... such policy, as a remedy for the issuance of an illusory contract. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Co., 192 Wis. 2d 463, 468, 531 N.W.2d 416 (Ct. App. 1995); see also Kaun v. Indust. Fire & Cas. Ins. Co., 148 Wis. 2d 662, 670, 436 N.W.2d 321 (1989); Hoglund v. Secura Ins., 176 Wis. 2d 265, 270-71, 500 N.W.2d 354 (Ct. App. 1993). The question in this case is the continued viability of this judicially-created remedy in light of a subsequent legislative one — a statute requiring underinsured motorist (UIM) policies to provide at least $50,000 in coverage — where the policy in question contains a clause conforming the policy to the requirements of state statute.

Austin J. Fox v. Catholic Knights, 2002 WI App 117

N/A

OUTCOME: Appeal

Three T's Trucking v. Gerald Kost, JR. 2007 AP 158

N/A

OUTCOME: Appeal

Albert E. Prost v. Progressive

N/A

OUTCOME: Appeal

Court of Appeals business matter.

S.A. Schapiro v. Rebecca Pokos

N/A

OUTCOME: appeal

Court of Appeals business matter.