Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
In the area of securities litigation, Mr. Sommer represents both investors and investment firms in connection with investor disputes, and has successfully represented financial advisors in connection with their departures from investment firms. In particular, Mr. Sommer has expertise regarding disputes involving signing bonuses and the repayment of promissory notes. He also represents firms in connection with raiding cases and is well-versed on the protocol for Broker Recruiting through his representation of departing financial advisors as well as firms.
Mr. Sommer has tried numerous cases in FINRA arbitrations for investors, financial advisors, and brokerage firms. Some of his successes include:
In the area of Marcellus Shale litigation, Mr. Sommer has handled claims arising from the environmental impacts of oil and gas development. For example, he successfully petitioned and advocated to the DEP to make a determination regarding the need to abate and remediate ongoing contamination that ultimately led to a seven figure settlement for the land owners.
In the areas of Intellectual Property; he has handled numerous oppositions to client’s portfolio of trademark applications, including defeating multiple summary judgment arguments, effectively conducting discovery resulting in the withdrawal of opposition to client’s trademark application, successfully arguing for registration of client’s marks after initial denial by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and successfully arguing on appeal to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals that the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board to cancel another party’s trademark should be upheld. He has also resolved in client’s favor copyright work for hire dispute and favorably resolved a misappropriation of trade secrets case involving theft of client information by competitor.
Mr. Sommer also has experience in representing clients in shareholder disputes involving closely held businesses, copyright infringement, litigation involving Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, defamation claims, breach of contract actions arising out of construction work, and litigation involving unpaid debts pursuant to promissory notes.
He has also counseled a solar energy developer on their leasing agreement’s compliance with applicable Pennsylvania law and has also counseled financial advisors in connection with
buy- out agreements for business succession purposes.
Education
Bar Admissions
Professional Affiliation
5
Practice Areas
24 years
24 years
24 years
Free Consultation
$0 first 30 minutes
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: Pennsylvania
Acquired: 2002
No misconduct found
706 Rochester Road, Pittsburgh, PA, 15237
Not Yet Reviewed
Securities and investment fraud lawyer | Jan 30
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
"I highly endorse Brian. He is diligent, hardworking, and cares about his clients."
Securities and investment fraud lawyer | Jan 10
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
"Brian and are former work colleagues. I have thus had the opportunity to see his work in the securities litigation field on a first hand level. He has successfully represented numerous clients, including trying cases before various courts. I endorse this lawyer."
Personal injury lawyer
Elder law lawyer
2015
Rising Star, Pennsylvania Super Lawyers
2014
Rising Star, Pennsylvania Super Lawyers
2013
Rising Star, Pennsylvania Super Lawyers
2005
(Nominee) Pittsburgh Civic Light Opera Award, Pittsburgh Civic Light Opera
2015 - Present
Attorney, Morella & Associates, A Professional Corporation
2010 - 2015
Of Counsel, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, LLP
2001 - 2010
Associate, Hergenroeder, Rega and Sommer
2010 - Present
Pennsylvania Bar AssociationMember
2001 - Present
Allegheny County Bar AssociationMember
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board's decision to grant cancellation of trademark is upheld.
Recovered both lost funds and attorneys fees for client
Client's payment obligation significantly reduced.
The Superior Court affirmed that the lawsuits were not subject to arbitration.
The arbitration panel awarded Claimant $75,000 in damages.
2001
JD - Juris Doctor
2015
What is Your Duty of Loyalty?
2015
Tibble v Edison Int’l - Redefining the Fiduciary Relationship?
2014
What’s in Your Client Agreements?
2013
Home Access: The Threat to Company IP Assets
2012
Non-Competes and Purple Squirrels: Can you Enforce Non-Compete Agreements Against Fired Employees.
2012
Applicability of the New FINRA Rules 2090 and 2111 and Why You Need to Know about Them
2015
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
2013
2013
2012
2012
2012
English
Legal Answers