Eugene, OR
Workers compensation Lawyer at Eugene, OR
Practice Areas: Workers Compensation, Social Security ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Our client's aggravation claim was upheld. Claim reopened and client got the treatment she needed and the timeloss necessary to sustain herself.
Objective findings necessary to prove a condition must be capable of observation, reproduction and measurement, but it is not necessary for the Attending Physician to actually observe, reproduce or mea ... sure. http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A128182.htm
OUTCOME: Our client was able to have the medical treatment he needed. He also was awarded time loss to make up for his economic loss.
This case affirmed a Board decision that our client was in the course and scope of his employment when he pulled of the public road to park his car in an area designated by employer, as it took him out ... of the zone of general public risk and, thus, out of the going an coming rule and in the course and scope of employment.
OUTCOME: Our clients, the widow and children, obtained death benefits to pay for funeral expenses. More importantly they were awarded monthly widow's and childrens' benefits.
Mr Luckman was a corporate office and an employee. He was moving a piece of equipment used for the business and it flipped over an killed him. SAIF denied his death claim. His widow and children wer ... e denied death benefits. We appealed, and through a close reading of the statute that said there had to be a "written declaration of coverage" were able to show that phrase did not apply to companies which carried SAIF insurance. SAIF lost at hearing and appealed. It lost at the board level and appealed to the Court of Appeals. We won.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
