Thomas A. Corletta

PRO

Thomas A. Corletta

4.5
Rating: 6.8

Licensed for 44 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at Rochester, NY
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Family ... +2 more

16 W Main St Ste 204, Rochester, NY

Virtual Consultation Available

About Thomas

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 25%

46 years

25%
DUI and DWI 25%

46 years

25%
Divorce and Separation 20%

46 years

20%
Family 20%

46 years

20%
Bankruptcy and Debt 10%

46 years

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2019 2017
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
2017

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 44 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1981

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Thomas A. Corletta, Esq.

16 W Main St Ste 204, Rochester, NY, 14614-1601

tcortrialatty.com/

Online Presence

Other places you can find Thomas online.

Thomas A. Corletta's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.5 /5.0

39 Client Reviews

Showing 36 - 39 of 39 reviews

Posted by Alyssa | September 29, 2025 | Speeding & Traffic Ticket

Extremely Unprofessional and Rude Communication

I reached out to this attorney with a simple inquiry regarding a traffic case and received one of the most unprofessional responses I’ve ever seen. His tone was condescending and unnecessarily rude from the start, and when I politely replied, he followed up with a hostile email telling me to “go else...where” and calling me “entitled.” It’s clear from our interaction that this attorney lacks professionalism, respect, and basic courtesy. I would strongly discourage anyone from contacting this office unless you’re comfortable being spoken to disrespectfully. There are many attorneys in the area who are far more professional and compassionate.

Thomas Corletta

Replied last October 01, 2025

Unfortunately, dealing with entitled individuals is an issue that many business owners have to deal with. I never worked for this woman on a mission running around the internet posting this review everywhere. I never worked for this individual. The quality of my work is shown by the other reviews posted on this site. This woman sent me an unsolicited email asking me for free services and whether I accepted a case on a contingent fee basis that I am ethically prohibited from accepting on that basis. She was told no and objected to my "tone". She doesn't post the screenshot here, but she has on Google. Take a look for yourself and decide whether the issue is my "tone" or her entitlement. I had no obligation to respond to her at all to begin with, but did so. When someone asks a lawyer whether they will violate professional ethics, it costs them nothing, but it costs the lawyer everything. I apologize for absolutely nothing and this woman should be avoided at all costs.

Posted by E | January 05, 2025

Bad

Rude and unprofessional over the phone. Consulted about a personal matter with trouble I got into. He was very rude over the phone and then hung up on me when I called him out for his rudeness. I wouldn't hire him.

Thomas Corletta

Replied last January 06, 2025

I have no idea who this is & cannot respond to this anonymous "review" of a phone call; with the exception that one need only look at my other reviews on this site, from those I ACTUALLY represented. That is what really counts. I did not represent this individual, whoever he/she is, and they have no right to "review" me. If they would like to discuss whatever they claim transpired on the phone, I would be happy to respond.

Posted by Whitney | May 23, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Bankruptcy & Debt

Bankruptcy

Mr. Corletta represented me when I filed bankruptcy 4 years ago. He kept urging me to get rid of my house, at that time...and when I declined, he's ask me how I was going to afford to pay for it. I felt that question was out of line. I, in good faith, paid this man and trusted him to represent me ...because I knew nothing about bankruptcy. Although, legally he had to "declare" my house in the bankruptcy, I was never given an option to sign a reaffirmation with my mortgage lender. I was not made aware of that. Because of this, my mortgage lender has not been reporting to the credit bureau which has a HUGE negative impact now that I want to get qualified for a new mortgage so that I can sell my house. I am not a deadbeat, my situation was due to a 12-year relationship where my partner opened several credit cards, in my name, behind my back, causing me no other option, but to file bankruptcy after ending our relationship. I now know the meaning of unethical. I will be filing a complaint

Thomas Corletta

Replied last May 23, 2018

This person attacked the quality of my services, calling me “unethical” on a public website. She waived the attorney/client privilege, and I am using facts obtained while representing her to defend myself. She claims I was “out of line” by advising her to “get rid of” her home. Her home had 2 mortgages with a balance of about $94,000.00. The tax assessment, which is usually high, was $102,000.00. Therefore, the home had virtually no equity. Further, her income was insufficient to support 2 mortgages. Bankruptcy allowed her to discharge the mortgages, and to walk away. She has no personal liability to the bank, which would have been forced to retake the property & sell it at their expense. She did not have to pay 2 mortgages. She could have lived there at least a year free before having to vacate. Part of my job is to give financial advice to Bankruptcy clients. People filing Bankruptcy have usually made poor financial choices. That is why Congress passed Bankruptcy Reform legislation in 2005. Debtors are required to get Credit Counseling & take a Financial Education course. As to Reaffirmation Agreements, debtors do not reaffirm real property for 2 reasons. First, it is not legally required. Most banks don’t even ask for reaffirmation on real property, because they can always foreclose if not paid. Debtors are only legally required to reaffirm personal property, like automobiles. This debtor did that. Second, if a debt is reaffirmed, there is no Bankruptcy protection on that debt. If something happens later and debtor can't pay, they can be sued on that debt just as if they hadn’t filed Bankruptcy. Bankruptcy gives a fresh start & helps escape oppressive debt. It is not a “credit repair” device. It is legal debt repudiation. No remedy like it exists. This debtor took full advantage to discharge nearly $30,000.00 in legitimate debt. She also discharged her personal liability on the mortgages. She chose to pay them & kept the home because Bankruptcy protection does not extend to collateral. A lender can repossess collateral, which is security for the loan. Since debtor continued to pay the mortgage, she kept the property, which had no value, other than as a place to live. She fails to mention the lender refusing to “qualify” her is the same lender holding her current mortgages. She also included an unsecured line of credit to that same lender in her Bankruptcy, which was fully discharged. That lender will now not qualify her. She can always go elsewhere. Finally, Bankruptcy is adverse credit information, and is reported on a Credit Report for 7-10 years. Debtor was fully aware of this. She took full advantage of the law, & received a Discharge without objection. Her “complaints” are not only specious, but false & misleading. I am considering suing her for defamation. I have successfully represented over 4,000 people in Bankruptcy proceedings.

Posted by anonymous | November 11, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Divorce & Separation

Run. Do not even bother

I needed a divorce attorney and called this person. Mind you i am an immigrant and obviously speak with an accent, but i've never heard anyone be more degrading and disrespectful as he was. He was very rude and all he wanted was money. I don't know who writes the reviews here, but if you read reviews... anywhere else they will back my story. If i had a chance to give him zero stars i would!

Thomas Corletta

Replied last November 11, 2016

It is difficult to respond to a review posted nearly 3 months ago that I was just notified about. It is even more difficult to respond to a review written by someone who does not give his/her name. This person claims, notwithstanding the review, that he/she hired me. I have no such client. This person gives no specifics as to how I was allegedly rude, and claims they are an immigrant with an accent, with covers about 60% of my client base. What that is supposed to mean, I have no idea. With respect to money, that would only have been discussed if I was asked about it. As a divorce attorney, I am required to tell clients what the state rules are regarding payment of legal fees in divorce matters, and that there must be a written Retainer Agreement. I never spoke to this person in my office. If this person was somehow offended by that, that is their problem. I am required by law and ethical rules to disclose this information. I suspect I also told this person I would not consult over the telephone. The reason for this is that I do not want to give incorrect legal advice I could be held responsible for, without being able to verify all the facts. This requires an office conference. I never met with this person. I never represented this person. I am at a loss as to how he/she can review me. If this person wishes to discuss their review with me face to face, and disclose their identity, I would be happy to do so. I will await their response.

See All Client Reviews

Thomas A. Corletta's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Thomas

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.8 (Good)

Honors

2022

Client Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1981 - Present

Principal, Thomas A. Corletta Attorney & Couselor at Law

1981 - 1992

Public Defender, Monroe County Public Defender Office

Associations

1990 - 1995

New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

People v. Washington 54 Misc3d 1217(A)

Dismissed on Speedy Trial Grounds

People v. Lloyd 167 AD2d 856

Indictment Dismissed

People v. Stefano 159 AD2d 661

People v. Robinson 97 NY2d 341

In re Donn B. & Donna M. CARLTON, Debtors. 211 B.R. 468 In re Robert N. & Karen E. KORNFIELD, Debtors. 211 B.R. 468

People v. Smith 163 Misc2d 353 People v. Richardson 163 Misc2d 353

Simplified Traffic Informations charging Defendants with Driving While Intoxicated dismissed without prejudice.

People v. Dunker 26 Misc3d 1203(A)

Evidence Suppressed, Charges Dismissed

In Re Robert W. Crowder, Jr. 2016 WL 3453214

In Re Deanna J. Gill 529 B.R. 31

See More Legal Cases

Education

1980

Suny At Buffalo

JD - Juris Doctor

1977

Allegheny College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Languages

English

Activity

Top Contributor

Thomas earned significant contribution points in 2017.

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution