Sun City Center, FL
Litigation Lawyer at Sun City Center, FL
Practice Areas: Litigation, Real Estate ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Negotiation of Collective Bargaining Agreement
Representation of Emergency Medical Personnel and Critical Care Technicians (Local 3525) in Collective Bargaining Agreement negotiations with Hillsborough County, Florida.
OUTCOME: The case was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff prior to trial.
This case involved disputes relating to the alleged trespass of cattle on a vast tract of undeveloped real property in central Florida. Mr. Fitzpatrick represented the defendant cattle rancher.
OUTCOME: The appellate court reversed, in part, affirmed, in part, and remanded the trial court's order.
This case involved a contract dispute between a real estate broker and agent over commissions. Mr. Fitzpatrick represented the real estate broker. The agent prevailed at trial and Mr. Fitzpatrick app ... ealed the trial court's order on behalf of his client.
OUTCOME: RRPOA's real property was removed from the proposed federal program.
The federal government sought the inclusion of River Ranch Acres in its proposed Everglades Headwaters National Wildlife Refuge and Conservation Area. Mr. Fitzpatrick represented the River Ranch Prope ... rty Owners' Association, Inc. in its opposition to the proposed federal program.
OUTCOME: The trial court's granting of Mr. Fitzpatrick's Motion for Summary Judgment was afirmed by the Second District Court of Appeals.
Mr. Fitzpatrick, on behalf of a homeowners' association, brought suit against members of the association for violations of the community's restrictive covenants. The trial court granted Mr. Fitzpatric ... k's Motion for Summary Judgment in favor of the association. This ruling was appealed by the homeowners to the Second District Court of Appeals.
OUTCOME: An agreed final judgment was entered by the trial court.
This case involved a boundary/survey dispute between Mr. Fitzpatrick's client, a church, and a neighboring commercial property owner.
OUTCOME: The appellate court affirmed the trial court's granting of Mr. Fitzpatrick's Motion for Summary Judgment.
This was a prescriptive easement case, wherein landowners were involved in a dispute over their ingress/egress rights to real property. Mr. Fitzpatrick filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on behalf of ... his client, a defendant, which was granted by the trial court. The trial court determined that a prescriptive easement had not been established by the plaintiffs. As a result, the plaintiffs filed an appeal.
OUTCOME: On appeal to the Third District Court of Appeals, Mr. Fitzpatrick was succesful in obtaining a reversal of the trial court's ruling in favor of his client.
This case arose out of a Key West eviction action, wherein the trial court denied a landlord's motion for default for non-payment of rent. Mr. Fitzpatrick represented the landlord in this action.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
