This question reveals a uniquely American phenomenon: the spinning of facts in one's head. The fact spinner fixates on a fact that consumes the...

Certainly nothing forces either the client or the attorney to stay together throughout a case whether payments are up to date or not. Here, it...

The asker takes a huge risk if she unilaterally relocates with the child to another jurisdiction. Even if there is no order of custody presently in...

One must ask how to jump out of the frying pan into the fire before asking about changing law guardians. These are an addition to the litigation...

The asker must avoid a trap that awaits any unsuspecting parent who has custody of his children. That is the "crying wolf" trap. This is the one...

The child protective apparatus can do anything it wants in the name of protecting children. As kids and drugs duo not mix, so come the apparatus to...

Technically speaking, a PFA Order is effective until it is vacated. If there is a violation of that Order just a day before it is vacated, it is...

America is not a "filing" country, but rather a "service" country. That means no court ever obtains personal jurisdiction over a defendant without...

Anyone can anyone else for any reason at any time. The problem arises when one wants to win. Here, there does not appear to be a malpractice but...

A child protective proceeding is America's smoke and mirrors. It appears from the tone of the question that the judge does not want to go to trial....