People v. G
Aug 27, 2010OUTCOME: Dismissed
Mr. G was charged with a felony 508 with a strike prior alleged. At the conclusion of the PX , Mr. G was not held to answer on the charge. He can now move on with his life.
Ridgecrest, CA
Criminal defense Lawyer at Ridgecrest, CA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Mr. G was charged with a felony 508 with a strike prior alleged. At the conclusion of the PX , Mr. G was not held to answer on the charge. He can now move on with his life.
OUTCOME: 1538.5 Granted Case Dismissed
Mr. T was charged with a violation of Penal Code 272 and BP 25658(C) and facing two probation violations. A 1538.5 was filed and litigated challenging the entry into his home. The suppression motion wa ... s granted and the case was dismissed. Mr. T can now move on with his life.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Ms. L was charged with a felony 245(a)(1) with GBI. Three days prior to trial, the People dismissed the case.
OUTCOME: Acquitted
Ms. B was charged with a violation of Penal Code 488. After a jury trial the jury came back in 15 minutes with a not guilty verdict. Ms. B. can now move on with her life.
OUTCOME: Reduced to Misdemeanor - Simple battery
Mr. L was facing a felony 273.5. right before trial a negotiated disposition was reached and Mr. L pled to a misdemeanor 243(a) (simple battery) . Mr. L can now move on with his life and career.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Ms. P was charged with a violation of Penal Code 273.5(a). The day of the jury trial the People dismissed the case. Ms. P can now move on with her life.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Mr. S was charged with a violation of Penal Code 273.5(a), one day before trial the People dismissed the case for insuff. cause.
OUTCOME: Case Dismissed 1538.5 Filed
Ms. J was charged with a violation of BP 4060. A 1538.5 was filed and the day the 1538.5 was to be heard, the case was dismissed. Ms. J can now move on with her life.
OUTCOME: 1538.5 Granted Case Dismissed
Mr. H was charged with an 11364 and 853.7. A motion was filed challenging the alleged consent and entry into his home. After litigating the motion was granted by the Honorable Judge Brehmer. The 853. ... 7 was dismissed upon the courts own motion.
OUTCOME: 1538.5 Granted
Mr. T was charged with a 14601.1 and a violation of felony probation which could have subjected Mr.T to prison time. A motion to suppress was filed challenging the stop of his vehicle. After litigati ... ng the motion the Honorable Judge Woodward granted the motion and the case was dismissed.