People vs. A.A.
Oct 13, 2016OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Client was charged with violation of Penal Code Section 148.5(a) - False Report of a Criminal Offense. Sucessfully negotiated resolution resulting in dismissal of charge.
PRO
Jesse Paul Duran's Legal Cases (6)
Lancaster, CA
Criminal defense Lawyer at Lancaster, CA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Juvenile
People vs. M.S.
Sep 28, 2016OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Client charged with Misdemeanor violation of Penal Code Section 273.5(a) - Injuring a Spouse, Cohabitant, Fiance, Boyfriend, Girlfriend, of Child's Parent. Successfully negotiated resolution whereby ca ... se was dismissed.
People vs. P.H.
Jun 08, 2015OUTCOME: Following investigation and presentation of evidence to the prosecutor, all charges were dismissed against Client.
Client charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon (truck). The prosecutor in this case offered state prison and a strike conviction to resolve the matter.
People vs. D.N.
Apr 27, 2015OUTCOME: Following presentation of defense evidence to prosecutor, we were able to successfully negotiate a dismissal of all charges.
Client charged with violation of Penal Code Section 245(a)(1) - Assault with a Deadly Weapon (Automobile).
People vs. F.V.
Aug 21, 2014OUTCOME: Case Dismissed
Client was charged with DUI wherein it was alleged that his blood alcohol content was nearly three times the legal limit (0.23). Upon being retained, I successfully brought a motion before the Court re ... sulting in a dismissal of all charges.
People v. A.H.
N/AOUTCOME: Successfully negotiated outcome whereby Client pled No Contest to a misdemeanor charge. Client placed on summary probation, served with a protective order, served 30 days in county jail, and the balance of the charges and enhancements were dismissed.
Client arrested and charged with violating Penal Code Section 245(b) – Assault with a Semiautomatic Firearm , a Serious Felony under California’s Three Strikes law. Client’s potential exposure on the c ... harge was 9 years in State Prison. An enhancement was also alleged against Client that could have resulted in an additional 10 years of incarceration.