In re K.M.T.
Aug 23, 2016OUTCOME: Reversed.
Termination of father's rights reversed where court did not find he was an unfit parent or that he substantially disregarded his parental obligations.
Seattle, WA
Appeals Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Appeals
OUTCOME: Reversed.
Termination of father's rights reversed where court did not find he was an unfit parent or that he substantially disregarded his parental obligations.
OUTCOME: Reversed
Sentence reversed because statute does not require trial court to run drug-crime enhancements consecutively across counts.
OUTCOME: Reversed
Conviction for obstruction of justice reversed because it was improperly based on defendant's exercise of his First Amendment right to observe and criticize police use of force, and defendant did not e ... ngage in any acts of physical obstruction.
OUTCOME: new trial
New trial required because court improperly denied request to instruct jury on lesser-included offense.
OUTCOME: Reversed
Sentence condition requiring defendant to stand on street corner with sign describing crime reversed because the relevant statute does not permit public shaming as part of punishment.
OUTCOME: Reversed
Conviction for making a false statement to a public servant reversed because listener was not a public servant under the statute
OUTCOME: Reversed
Convictions reversed because trial court improperly dismissed a potential hold-out juror and violated the defendant's constitutional right to confront the witnesses against him.
OUTCOME: reversed
Conviction reversed because trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant's motion to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense
OUTCOME: reversed
conviction reversed for violation of the right to be free from double jeopardy
OUTCOME: reversed
Mail fraud conviction reversed for insufficient evidence.