John A. O'Brien

John A. O'Brien

also known as Jack O'Brien

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 58 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Bridgehampton, NY
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property

Po Box 353, Bridgehampton, NY

About John

Practice Areas

2

Practice Areas

Patent Infringement 90%

see www.obrien-iplaw.com

56 years

90%
Intellectual Property 10%

see www.obrien-iplaw.com

56 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 200-200 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 57 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1968

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 58 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1968

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of John A. O'Brien

Po Box 353, Bridgehampton, NY, 11932-0353

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John A. O'Brien's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

John A. O'Brien's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2018

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Associations

District of Columbia Bar

Member

New York State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

New York Intellectual Property Law Association

Member

International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association

Member

Chartered Institute of Arbitrators

Member

American Bar Association, Dispute Resolution Section

Member

American Intellectual Property Law Association, Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee

Member

New York State Dispute Resolution Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

see www.obrien-iplaw.com

See More Legal Cases

Education

1967

Georgetown University Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1963

Villanova University

BEE

Speaking Engagements

2012

IP Practice in Japan Committee

FIRST INVENTOR TO FILE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT

2012

FIRST INVENTOR TO FILE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT, STATUS AND AIPLA COMMENTS

FIRST INVENTOR TO FILE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT, STATUS AND AIPLA COMMENTS

2011

Public Interest Considerations Relating To ITC Exclusion Orders

SPANSION v INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

2011

Practicing Law Institute, Advanced Prosecution Workshop

THERASENSE v. BECTON DICKINSON - EN BANC FEDERAL CIRCUIT RAISES BAR FOR PROVING INEQUITABLE CONDUCT

2011

Joint meeting of the Japanese Patent Attorneys Association and the American Intellectual Property Association

MOCK DEPOSITION OF A JAPANESE PATENT ATTORNEY IN A US PROCEEDING

2011

Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution

TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2011

Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop

ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATION DRAFTING ISSUES

2010

IP Practice in Japan Committee

PATENT ASSIGNMENT AND LICENSE GRANTS -- RECENT FEDERAL CIRCUIT DECISIONS

2010

IP Practice in Japan Committee

USPTO INITIATIVES AND NOTICES

2010

Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution

TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2010

Advanced Prosecution Workshop 2010

BILSKI v KAPPOS

2010

Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2010

ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATION DRAFTING ISSUES

2010

a mock demonstration

MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION

2009

IP Practice In Japan Committee

QUALCOMM INC V. BROADCOM CORP - EQUITABLE REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF DISCLOSURE DUTY IN A STANDARDS -SETTING ORGANIZATION

2009

IP Practice in Japan Committee

RAMBUS, INC v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION - IMPACT ON STANDARDS-SETTING ORGANIZATIONS AND ANTITRUST

2009

Fundamentals of Patent Prosecution 2009

TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2009

Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2009

ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATIONS DRAFTING ISSUES

2009

Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2009

BILSKI V. DOLL - IS THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S "MACHINE OR TRANSFORMATION" TEST,THE ONLY TEST FOR SECTION 101 SUBJECT MATTER

2008

IP Practice In Japan Committee

QUANTA AND ITS AFTERMATH

2008

Advanced Patent Prosecution Workshop 2008

ADVANCED SPECIFICATION DRAFTING ISSUES

Publications

2012

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FIRST INVENTOR TO FILE UNDER THE AMERICA INVENTS ACT

2012

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP

2011

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2011

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION

2011

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATION ISSUES

2011

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP

2010

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2010

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2010: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2010

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATION DRAFTING ISSUES

2010

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP: CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2009

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2009: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2009

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURE'S: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2009

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT SPECIFICATION DRAFTING ISSUES

2009

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) BILSKI V. DOLL - IS THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT'S "MACHINE OR TRANSFORMATION" TEST THE ONLY TEST FOR 101 SUBJECT MATTER

2009

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP 2009: CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2008

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES: PRACTICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

2008

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2008: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2008

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP 2008: CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2007

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) TAKING INVENTION DISCLOSURES

2007

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2007: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2007

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2007: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2007

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) KSR INTERNATIONAL CO. V. TELEFLEX – THE STANDARD OF NON-OBVIOUS SUBJECT MATTER

2007

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP 2007: CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2006

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) ADVANCED PATENT PROSECUTION WORKSHOP 2006: CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WRITING

2006

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) FUNDAMENTALS OF PATENT PROSECUTION 2006: A BOOT CAMP FOR CLAIM DRAFTING AND AMENDMENT WROTING

2006

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) INEQUITABLE CONDUCT – IS THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT REVIVING THE PLAGUE OF THE PAST?

2006

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) LABORATORY CORP. V. METABOLITE – BAD OMEN AS TO WHETHER THE STATE STREET BANK’S “USEFUL, CONCRETE AND TANGIBLE RESULT” TEST FOR SECTION 101 SUBJECT MATTER WILL WITHSTAND SUPREME COURT SCRUTINY

2006

Practicing Law Institute (PLI) KSR INTERNATIONAL Co. v. TELEFLEX – WILL THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT’S “TEACHING, SUGGESTION, OR MOTIVATION TEST TO COMBINE PRIOR ART WITHSTAND SUPREME COURT SCRUTINY?

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution