Saint Louis, MO
Cannabis Law Lawyer at Saint Louis, MO
Practice Areas: Cannabis Law, Litigation, Business
OUTCOME: The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the district court's dismissal of all the claims against our client.
Dismissal of putative consumer class action alleging deceptive advertising. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the decision.
OUTCOME: The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of the claims against our clients.
Summary judgment for the officers and directors of a national defense company against former shareholders' putative class action claims.
OUTCOME: The Court dismissed all the claims against our client.
The firm defended a national clothing retailer in a putative consumer class action lawsuit. Therein, the plaintiffs alleged that the retailer's advertising and marketing violated New Jersey's consumer ... fraud statutes. The firm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, attacking the sufficiency of the complaint and arguing that the lawsuit failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the plaintiffs and their putative class suffered no ascertainable loss or damages. The district court granted the motion and dismissed the lawsuit.
OUTCOME: The Court held that our client's information was copyright protected, and the defendants consented to a permanent decree against using our client's information in the future.
Summary judgment that information was copyright protected, and secured consent decree in favor of National Football Scouting on its trade secrets claims.
OUTCOME: The Court held that our client's real estate was not subject to the developer's attempts to impose discretionary use restrictions.
The firm represented the Krispy Kreme Doughnut franchisee in the Chicago metropolitan area, who had purchased real estate in a suburban mixed use commercial development. After building and operating i ... ts retail doughnut store for several years, the franchisee contracted to sell the real estate to a retail bank. The mixed use development owners claimed that the original real estate sale agreement and deed of trust granted them the authority to deny the proposed use of the real estate as a bank, which effectively blocked the sale. The trial court misapplied the law and ruled against our client but the Court of Appeals unanimously reversed and granted our client the relief it sought. The Court of Appeals held that the language in the sale agreement and deed of trust was ambiguous and therefore insufficient to impose an enforceable restrictive covenant over our client's real estate.
OUTCOME: The Court held that our client was not subject to the control that the plaintiff association attempted to impose.
The firm defended a non-profit conference center from a religious association's claims that it owned or had the right to control the conference center. The firm successfully argued that the relationsh ... ip between our client and the association was voluntary and gave rise to no enforceable rights. When the religious association appealed, the firm successfully obtained a unanimous decision from the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court's judgment.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
