Universal v. Naglak, et al.
Feb 25, 2016OUTCOME: Finding in favor of our Plaintiff
Insurance coverage issue regarding undisclosed, resident driver using an insured automobile for regular use.
Chicago, IL
Divorce and separation Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation
OUTCOME: Finding in favor of our Plaintiff
Insurance coverage issue regarding undisclosed, resident driver using an insured automobile for regular use.
OUTCOME: Finding in favor of our Plaintiff
Insurance coverage dispute involving unlisted, unlicensed driver involved in an automobile accident.
OUTCOME: Policy Paid to Plaintiff
Plaintiff was traveling in through lane on a motorcycle with the solid green light when Defendant made a left turn, failing to yield to oncoming traffic.
OUTCOME: Policy limits to our Plaintiff
Plaintiff was crossing the street in a cross-walk with the signal when Defendant struck Plaintiff causing his death. Defendant then fled the scene and was apprehended 4 hours later.
OUTCOME: Settlement for our Planitiff
Legal Malpractice regarding divorce; previous attorney failed to properly calculate military pension, rank and benefits at time of retirement in the divorce.
OUTCOME: Find for our Plaintiff
Insured was involved in a single automobile accidnet in Mexico, 100 miles from US/Mexico boarder with 5 people injured as a result. No Coverage finding since accident happened outside USA.
OUTCOME: For Plaintiff; confidential settlement award
Plaintiff was leaving a bar when two intoxicated patrons left the establishment. Defendants entered their vehicle and when they say Plaintiff, exited their vehicle, while drunk and assaulted Plaintiff ... with a golf club, hands and feet.
OUTCOME: Trial Verdict for Plaintiff (Unique)
Insured driver reversed his vehicle in a parking lot, intentionally striking two pedestrians (one a minor) causing severe injuries. Pedestrians filed a lawsuit for the policy limits. Mr. Holwell filed ... a declaratory action alleging intention act exclusion.