Damages wholly insufficient to justify the cost and time needed to properly pursue a malptractice action.

Generally without significant damages, as opposed to damages that are significant to you, these cases are not accepted on contingency basis.

Damages from this clerical error are not worth initiating a malpractice action despite it possibly necessitating a second muscle biopsy.

Damages are too limited and would not justify the expenses of litigating a malpractice case which is expensive and time consuming.

Get all the relevant records and imaging studies to medical malpractice counsel to have reviewed by an appropriate expert to determine if the...

Get all the relevant records and imaging studies to medical malpractice counsel to have reviewed by adental expert to determine if the standard of...

Get all the relevant records and imaging studies to medical malpractice counsel to have reviewed by an appropriate expert to determine if the...

Damages for this extravastion may preclude from an economic standpoint consideration of legal action. You may be able to find counsel to try to...

If you are not a party to the case, you cannot object to it, even if you believe an injustice was perpetrated. If you are a party to the case, do...

Damages would not likely make this worth pursuing and you may wish to find a pediatrician or pediatric neurologist who is more responsive.