You are only entitled to recover for actual damages, not for what could have happened. Any event that does not cause injuries that require medical...

The employee would be responsible for their own actions of intentionally trying to poison you, but it is unlikely Taco Bell's responsibility.

Any injury that does not require medical attention generally does not warrant legal action. Damages may likely prove to be inadequate.

The actions of the loss prevention personal seem justifiable as you did take an item you did not pay for. Unlikely that your damages will entice...

Unless this kid is independently wealthy there is likely no way to get compensation for an intentional act.

If you are having problems getting representation than either there are issues wityh liability or damages in your case. You can use Avvo find a...

Without demonstrable damages that required medical treatment, it is unlikely worth the time and expense to initiate a lawsuit.

Without medical attention being required to treat your injuries it is unlikely justifiable to believe that those injuries warrant legal action.

Unclear as to what advise you are seeking and how that would possibly relate to a personal injury lawsuit.

Sounds like you got off easily as criminal charges for assault could have been made and pursued by the local authorities.