Susan Melissa Moss

By it’s very nature, contacting a top family lawyer is usually not going to come at a comfortable time in one’s life. Sue’s combination of experience, intelligence, and compassion made a set of uncomfortable circumstances more predictable, less stressful, and resulted in a more fair outcome for all i...nvolved. Sue has a keen wit and possesses a profound understanding of her area of law, and how those principals of law intersect and shape human behavior. Except when Sue is in court for other clients, she is remarkably available and responsive, which can be very important as family situations can be fluid and unexpected, requiring relatively rapid decision making. It is clear to me that Sue is highly regarded by the judges and court staff in the Family Court in New York City and that her reputation in that setting for competence and integrity directly benefits her ability to represent new and current clients. This combination of experience and excellence does not come cheaply, but in the end it is a value.

I am writing this review based on the alarming conduct documented in the real where Sue Moss was appointed as Attorney for the Children. Those considering the services of Sue Moss should be aware of serious allegations regarding her professional integrity and advocacy such as: Fabrication of "O...ral Orders": In this case, Ms. Moss reportedly asserted the existence of unverified "Oral Orders" that were neither recorded nor stated in open court. These alleged orders were used to strip a mother of her parental rights and mandate supervised visits at an astronomical cost. Defiance of Judicial Mandates: Documents indicate she ignored protocols established by the presiding judge and replaced qualified, court-appointed experts—who specialized in identifying parental alienation—with inexperienced social workers to influence the court’s direction. Failure of Due Diligence: Despite extensive reports from experts identifying dynamics of coercive control and domestic violence, Ms. Moss is accused of failing to perform necessary due diligence, choosing instead to facilitate a "personal vendetta" that obstructed all contact between the children and their loving and innocent mother for years. Medical Neglect: Concerns were raised regarding her failure to advocate for a child's health when informed of worsening conditions and withheld medical records. Susan Moss is a personification of moral degradation and a betrayal of the best interests of the children she was appointed to represent and protect. Having Sue Moss in your case is a stamp of guaranteed inhumane and barbaric tactics, no matter whose side she is on. There is only one side for Ms.Moss — her side. The side no one, believe me, wants to be on, no matter who she represents.