Trademark Question
Merely adding the word "fabulous" to the mark is not going to be enough to defeat a confusingly similar rejection if the marks are otherwise the...
New York, NY
Business Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Business, Contracts & Agreements ... +2 more
Merely adding the word "fabulous" to the mark is not going to be enough to defeat a confusingly similar rejection if the marks are otherwise the...
It's not clear what you intend to do here. When you say figures so you mean merely use factual data? If so, then that should be fine. But if you...
You may be able to register this. Under US trademark law, a mark which is “primarily merely a surname” cannot be protected as a trademark without...
The context matters and we really don't have info here. But yes it is possible that the former employer owns the copyright in the photos and just...
I'm not sure what you are referring to specifically when you say "Jordan sign," but as noted this could be both a copyright as well as trademark...
You can easily look up the DMCA take down process and counter-claim process online. It is very simple to do. If you have concerns, I suggest...
Likely problematic, both from a copyright aspect as well as a violation of privacy and publicity rights. These kick in when one uses the name,...
Maybe, so long as it is not merely descriptive as noted. I'm not so sure it is, however, there may be conflicts, which is why the clearance will be...
As noted, this might be considered generic if the general market uses the term to describe that fabric. Even if it is not considered generic it may...
The picture is both a copyright problem as well as a false presentment of association, which is a trademark problem. Using the name alone might...