In re Warrington 424 BR 186 (Bankr ED PA 2010
Jan 01, 2010OUTCOME: Court required creditor to return vehicle to my client
Secured creditor refused to return vehicle repossessed just before bankruptcy filed
Cherry Hill, NJ
Bankruptcy and debt Lawyer at Cherry Hill, NJ
Practice Areas: Bankruptcy & Debt, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Court required creditor to return vehicle to my client
Secured creditor refused to return vehicle repossessed just before bankruptcy filed
OUTCOME: Court and appellate court agreed that the mother was the true owner of the property
Son's bankruptcy trustee attempted to sell mother's home that had been placed in son's name for no consideration
OUTCOME: The result was Bankruptcy Court agreed with Mr. Braverman and overturned the Sheriff’s Sale as a conveyance for less than fair value.
Client’s property sold in Sheriff Sale prior to retaining Robert Braverman to file bankruptcy.
OUTCOME: Matter involved 23 consolidated cases addressing the extent to which Ch. 13 debtor may propose to deal with claim of mortgagee in Ch. 13 Plan when there is a final judgment. The Court concluded Plans did not adequately protect secured creditor’s rights
Case dealt with a mortgage company seeking relief from the Automatic Stay and the rights of a debtor when a foreclosure judgment has already been entered prior to the filing of the bankruptcy.
OUTCOME: The Bankruptcy Court concluded that the debtors may propose a confirmable Plan under Chapter 13 to satisfy arrearages after a Chapter 7.
The case involved issue of whether after a Chapter 7 a debtor could file a Chapter 13 Plan to satisfy the mortgage arrears
OUTCOME: Mr. Braverman was successful before the Appellate Division in arguing that client guaranteed a secured debt and since the bank failed to obtain a security interest they could not pursue client on guarantee.
Bank sued Mr. Braverman’s client as co-signer on vehicle where bank had failed to properly obtain a security interest in vehicle.