State v. O'Connell
Feb 07, 1978OUTCOME: 383 A.2d 624
A patient hospitalized pursuant to court order petitioned for review, and the petition was dismissed by the Superior Court but the Superior Court's order was reversed and the cause remanded, 375 A.2d 9 ... 82. On appeal to the Supreme Court from the commitment order of the District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 5, Washington Circuit, John P. Connarn, J., the Supreme Court, Daley, J., held that the trial court in proper performance of its judicial function and exercise of independent judgment in acting upon an application for commitment for mental treatment must do more than repeat the expert's testimony before it, and where the trial court merely repeated the psychiatrist's report and opinion as such without making a finding of present mental illness, and also appeared to rely on determination of insanity at the time of the offense, the commitment procedure was defective.
