We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
David K. Kouroyen
About David
Biography
David K. Kouroyen Jr. joined Keches Law Group, P.C. as an attorney in 2017. Attorney Kouroyen was born in Newton, Massachusetts, but spent the majority of his life in New Hampshire. While earning his law degree cum laude from Suffolk University Law School, Attorney Kouroyen was a Moot Court Lead Article Editor and actively participated in several of Suffolk’s trial competitions. As a member of Suffolk’s Accelerator Practice Clinic, Attorney Kouroyen represented low-income individuals, helping them combat housing and employment discrimination.
Attorney Kouroyen comes from several generations of brick masons and waterproofers and would spend his college and law school summers working construction in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Attorney Kouroyen is licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.
Practice Areas
1
Practice Area
Fees and Rates
Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.
Search our directory
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withLicenses
Licensed in Massachusetts for 9 years
State: Massachusetts
Acquired: 2016
No misconduct found
Location
Keches Law Group
122 Dean Street, Taunton, MA, 02780
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
David K. Kouroyen's Reviews
Avvo Review Score
Not Yet Reviewed
David K. Kouroyen's Lawyer Endorsements
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
Experience
Education
2016
Suffolk University Law School
JD - Juris Doctor, Cum Laude
2013
Roger Williams University
Bachelor of Arts, Summa Cum Laude
Publications
2016
21 Suffolk J. Trial & App. Advoc.
Warger v. Shauers: Tanner 2.0 and the Need for a Less Restrictive Interpretation of Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) and its Exceptions.