Hingham District Court - Commonwealth v. R. B.
Aug 02, 2017OUTCOME: Not Guilty
OUI SECOND OFFENSE - NOT GUILTY: An off-duty Hull Police Officer was traveling home from his shift at approximately 12:30 a.m.. As he was driving on Route 228 in Hingham, he observed a pickup truck c ... ross over the fog line several times, nearly striking an embankment. Fearing for the safety of the driver and other motorists, the officer called 911. As the vehicle approached the intersection of Route 53 and Route 228, the officer observed the vehicle make a left onto Route 53 while the Left Turn Only arrow was still red. The officer continued to follow the vehicle into the Town of Norwell. The vehicle made a right onto High Street and parked in the Cole School parking lot. The officer testified that the vehicle remained in the parking lot for approximately 5 minutes before returning to the roadway. The officer stated that he observed the left directional illuminate, then the right directional, before the vehicle made a right back onto Route 53. The officer followed the vehicle while he remained on the phone with 911. After approximately 2 miles, two Norwell police cruisers located the vehicle and initiated a stop. The officers testified that the client did not pass the Alphabet Test, the Counting Backwards Test, the Nine Step Walk and Turn, or the One Leg Stand. The officers testified that the client had heavily slurred speech, smelt like alcohol and had bloodshot eyes. The officers also testified that the client admitted to drinking. At trial, through the cross examination of the three officers, Attorney Higgins was able to show that but for the alleged marked lanes violation on Route 228, the client demonstrated an ability to safely operate his vehicle. The officers conceded that from the intersection of Route 228 and Route 53 to the location of the stop, the client did not swerve, weave, or drift. The officers also conceded that the client was able to utilize the vehicle's brakes appropriately, negotiate turns appropriately, and that he maintained an appropriate speed for the roadway. Client was found Not Guilty on both OUI and Negligent Operation.