Quincy, MA
Criminal defense Lawyer at Quincy, MA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Defendant charged with Breaking & Entering for Felony after allegedly climbing into a home through a front window and taking a 50" tv and a number of additional items. On the date of trial, the charge ... was dismissed.
OUTCOME: Settlement: $72,500.00
Client was struck by a car while riding his motorcycle, suffering multiple non life-threatening injuries and missing approximately 3 months of work. After an initial offer of $36,000.00 and 5 months o ... f subsequent negotiations, the case settled for $72,500.00.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
The Defendant was charged with "Sexual Conduct for Fee" after undercover police contacted the Defendant through his advertisement on a website. The Defendant, via text message, agreed to perform sexua ... l services in exchange for a fee of $200.00. The undercover police eventually met up with the Defendant and gave him $200.00 in exchange for the sexual services, at which point he was placed under arrest. The charge was dismissed on the day of trial.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Defendant was charged with Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle, after striking another car from behind that was pulled over in the breakdown lane. After arguing there was no evidence the Defendant ... operated his motor vehicle negligently, the Commonwealth agreed to dismiss the case.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
The Defendant was charged with Violation of a 209A (Restraining Order), which included a " no contact" provision. The Defendant was alleged to have gone to the Dunkin Donuts where his ex-girlfriend w ... orked and asked her about dropping the order. On the day of trial, the charges were dismissed.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Defendant charged with Threat to Commit Crime after an argument with his neighbor. The neighbor alleged that the Defendant threatened to kill her. On the day of trial, the charges were dismissed afte ... r the alleged victim did not appear.
OUTCOME: Jury Trial: Not Guilty
Client charged with Assault & Battery- Family/Household Member. During trial, the CW introduced the 911 call from the alleged victim stating that her boyfriend, who she identified as my client, was hi ... tting and beating her. A police officer testified that, upon his arrival, he came into contact with the alleged victim and she had a fat lip, several bumps on her head, and it appeared as if she had been crying. Through cross-examination of the police officer and the alleged victim's mother, Attorney Riccio was able to establish a number of inconsistencies between their testimony and the 911 call, resulting in the jury returning a verdict of Not Guilty.
OUTCOME: File without Change of Plea
Defendant was charged with: 1) Assault & Battery with a Dangerous Weapon and 2) Threat to Commit a Crime (threat to kill). On the day of trial, the District Attorney's Office offered to file the case ... without a change of plea, resulting in the Defendant's plea of Not Guilty at arraignment, remaining on file. The charges will be dismissed after 6 months and the Defendant was not required to make any admission to sufficient facts, was not placed on probation, and will not be required to pay any fines or fees.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Defendant charged with: 1) Disorderly Conduct; 2) Minor in Possession of Alcohol; and 3) Keeping a Noisy & Disorderly House after police responded to complaints of a noisy and unruly party at the Defen ... dant's home, who was 18 years old. Police observed a number of teenagers that were drinking and appeared to be intoxicated, inside the Defendant's home, as well as in his yard and out in the street. Police indicated that the Defendant was intoxicated and uncooperative throughout the encounter.
OUTCOME: Jury Trial: Not Guilty
Defendant charged with: 1) OUI; 2) Negligent Operation of MV; 3) Unlicensed Operation; 4) Unregistered MV; 5) License Plate # Violation; 6) Uninsured MV. Prior to trial, count 2 (negligent operation) ... was dismissed by the Judge after hearing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Counts 3 - 6 were dismissed by the Judge after hearing Defendant's Motions in Limine. The breath test was excluded from evidence prior to trial after Attorney Riccio successfully argued the Commonwealth failed to establish that the breath test machine was properly certified at the time the Defendant's breath test was administered. At the close of trial, where the evidence was the Defendant had a strong odor of alcohol coming from her person, did not pass all of the field sobriety tests, and had bloodshot eyes and slurred speech, a jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
